Timeline for Are these equivalent (for p-values): super-uniform, stochastically larger than / dominating the uniform, conservative?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2020 at 14:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Dec 12, 2019 at 12:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackStats/status/1205095090995236864 | ||
| Jul 26, 2019 at 11:33 | history | edited | dlaehnemann | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 482 characters in body
|
| Jul 26, 2019 at 5:47 | comment | added | air | I think that for any statistician working in multiple testing these notions are equivalent. By the way, another related notion that is different that has recently come up in the context of Knockoff-based FDR methods (rather than Benjamini-Hochberg variants) is the notion of mirror-conservatism. It is implied by uniformity but is not implied nor implies conservativeness. See equation (3) in Lei and Fithian, "AdaPT: an interactive procedure for multiple testingwith side information" (JRSSB, 2018). The discussion just below it might interest you too. | |
| Jul 26, 2019 at 5:42 | comment | added | air | That sounds like an excellent overview to me and you are correct! | |
| Jul 24, 2019 at 14:50 | review | First posts | |||
| Jul 24, 2019 at 16:13 | |||||
| Jul 24, 2019 at 14:47 | history | asked | dlaehnemann | CC BY-SA 4.0 |