Timeline for regression with multiple independent variables vs multiple regressions with one independent variable
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
17 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 5, 2021 at 18:44 | history | edited | Sextus Empiricus | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 123 characters in body
|
Oct 25, 2019 at 12:00 | comment | added | carlo | *which of the two plots | |
Oct 25, 2019 at 11:47 | history | edited | Sextus Empiricus | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
Oct 25, 2019 at 11:45 | comment | added | carlo | I don't understand the "six times a single regression line" part. what of the two plots are you talking about? | |
Oct 25, 2019 at 11:41 | comment | added | Sextus Empiricus | @Carlo the reason that I started to think about the interaction term is because of the title "regression with multiple independent variables vs multiple regressions with one independent variable" which I associated with making multiple regression lines. That's what I did in the code it is actually six times a single regression line. The effort has gone too far too change it back now, but I will add an extra clarification. | |
Oct 25, 2019 at 11:40 | history | edited | Sextus Empiricus | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
Oct 25, 2019 at 11:40 | comment | added | carlo | I just saw your last edit. way better, I would put the first part in the end and avoid to compare multiple regression with interaction with simple regressions (use multiple regression w/out interaction instead). I'm deleting my first comment. | |
Oct 25, 2019 at 11:37 | comment | added | carlo | that's better. but it work's because the two predictors are independent. it wouldn't work otherwise, and correlation between covariates are the main reason to use multiple regression in the first place. actually, I think that's not a good idea to introduce interaction to someone who still doesn't understand difference between simple and multiple regression | |
Oct 25, 2019 at 11:37 | history | edited | Sextus Empiricus | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 121 characters in body
|
Oct 25, 2019 at 11:32 | comment | added | Sextus Empiricus | @carlo I have changed it accordingly by splitting up the question and making the first part more explicitly about the interaction term. | |
Oct 25, 2019 at 11:31 | history | edited | Sextus Empiricus | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 121 characters in body
|
Oct 25, 2019 at 11:22 | history | edited | Sextus Empiricus | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 121 characters in body
|
Oct 25, 2019 at 11:14 | history | edited | Sextus Empiricus | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 121 characters in body
|
Oct 24, 2019 at 19:45 | history | edited | Sextus Empiricus | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
I can't change my username into my desired pseudonym so I place it in the post
|
Sep 13, 2019 at 14:49 | history | edited | Sextus Empiricus | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 33 characters in body
|
Aug 19, 2019 at 19:05 | history | edited | Sextus Empiricus | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 34 characters in body
|
Aug 19, 2019 at 11:48 | history | answered | Sextus Empiricus | CC BY-SA 4.0 |