Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 21, 2019 at 18:10 comment added IrishStat You say "In general, ARIMA should perform better than regression for forecasting time series data." I say autobox.com/pdfs/regvsbox-old.pdf
Sep 20, 2019 at 19:24 history edited user2974951 CC BY-SA 4.0
edited body
Sep 20, 2019 at 6:39 comment added user2974951 @MahmudulHasan Personally I don't see clear patterns in the data, the first plot looks like it might keep increasing, but the second looks like it could go either way. You may be better off using some simple predictions, such as the naive method.
Sep 20, 2019 at 6:27 comment added Mahmudul Hasan So, what if I want to forecast this data, do you suggest I should solely rely on expert's opinion. On more thing, does 1st image looks have no trend as well?
Sep 20, 2019 at 6:23 comment added user2974951 @MahmudulHasan Sure, something is better than nothing, however you still need a sensible something. For the second part, that depends on the data. If you really think that the previous data comes from a different process, then you can exclude it, since you are not really interested in. However, if this is about a period when something different happened, you can still keep it in the data and process it appropriately, such as using a dummy variable for war.
Sep 20, 2019 at 6:20 comment added Mahmudul Hasan Don't you think it's better to have something than nothing in hand if you want to get a picture about future! May be it can be adjusted with expert's opinion. Another point is I had 36 years historical data, which represents some country employment. However, it faced war from 1985-1997 and data was very unusual that time. Before 1997 pattern and after 1997 pattern was very different. So, isn't it logical not use that part of data in forecasting?
Sep 20, 2019 at 6:04 history answered user2974951 CC BY-SA 4.0