Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 25, 2019 at 20:32 comment added Nick Cox There was a long history in major statistical journals of sharp reviews of successive editions of the Kendall series (latterly revised by Stuart, Ord and Arnold, but of those four only Keith Ord survives and the series appears stalled) as being less than rigorous. It has other virtues, but rigour is not its main claim to attention. Wasserman's books are a nice compromise between clarity and rigour.
Nov 25, 2019 at 20:31 history closed Robert Long
Michael R. Chernick
jbowman
whuber
Duplicate of rigorous statistical-inference book recommendation
Nov 25, 2019 at 20:13 answer added JTH timeline score: 3
Nov 25, 2019 at 16:59 history edited stranger CC BY-SA 4.0
edited title
Nov 25, 2019 at 16:56 history made wiki Post Made Community Wiki by whuber
Nov 25, 2019 at 16:54 history edited stranger CC BY-SA 4.0
edited title
Nov 25, 2019 at 16:50 review Close votes
Nov 25, 2019 at 20:35
Nov 25, 2019 at 16:48 history edited stranger CC BY-SA 4.0
added 13 characters in body; edited title
Nov 25, 2019 at 16:39 answer added PsychometStats timeline score: 1
Nov 25, 2019 at 16:39 comment added Sycorax stats.stackexchange.com/…
Nov 25, 2019 at 16:35 review First posts
Nov 25, 2019 at 16:53
Nov 25, 2019 at 16:33 history asked stranger CC BY-SA 4.0