Skip to main content
6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:44 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://stats.stackexchange.com/ with https://stats.stackexchange.com/
Nov 21, 2012 at 22:43 comment added whuber OK, great. Thanks for answering my question about the union bound. (+1)
Nov 21, 2012 at 22:32 comment added Dilip Sarwate @whuber I have incorporated your comments in my revised answer. I wrote out the location-scale transformations because the OP seemed to be not able to recognize that the different means and variances are easily handled, and I agree with your comment on your own answer that the idea applies not just to normal distributions.
Nov 21, 2012 at 22:26 history edited Dilip Sarwate CC BY-SA 3.0
talked about tightness, corrected typo, added definition of $Q(x)$ as pointed out by whuber
Nov 21, 2012 at 22:02 comment added whuber (1) How good is the union bound? I would expect it to be poor for $n \ge 3$, because there is so much overlap among the subsets, but I haven't checked. (2) You need to adjust $n$ to $n-1$ in your first integral. (3) I think your notation gets in the way. By writing out the location-scale transformations, you actually make your answer less general than it could be: it is unnecessary to restrict the analysis to such a situation. (4) Presumably, "$Q$" should be the complementary CDF $1-\Phi$ at the end.
Nov 21, 2012 at 21:45 history answered Dilip Sarwate CC BY-SA 3.0