Timeline for Assumption of normally distributed residuals in linear regression
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2019 at 14:34 | history | edited | beuhbbb | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 8 characters in body
|
| Dec 20, 2019 at 11:00 | comment | added | Davide ND | You're right, I removed the "the reason is". Definetly misleading since I was giving an example and not a full explanation! | |
| Dec 20, 2019 at 10:54 | comment | added | beuhbbb | @DavideDN Well, our answers completement each others. However, I really think your first sentence "The reason is that the normal distribution is fully defined by its mean and variance, while other distributions are not. " is missleading and think it should be removed/repharse | |
| Dec 20, 2019 at 10:51 | comment | added | Davide ND | Definitely a better answer, I just gave a counter example on why it is not enough to ask for exogeneity and spherical errors :) | |
| Dec 20, 2019 at 10:50 | history | edited | beuhbbb | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 5 characters in body
|
| Dec 20, 2019 at 10:41 | history | answered | beuhbbb | CC BY-SA 4.0 |