Skip to main content
edited tags
Link
kjetil b halvorsen
  • 82.8k
  • 32
  • 201
  • 663
Source Link
Paze
  • 2.3k
  • 1
  • 15
  • 33

What can spearman's rank do that regression can't?

It seems to me, that with today's computing power, tools such as spearman's rank/correlation are completely useless. They uncover the exact same information as a regression, except they can't make predictions, can't establish cause and effect and don't fit with curvilinear data.

A regression on the other hand can do everything a Spearman's correlation can do.

So my question is. Why would anyone ever use Spearman's correlation?

I realize the question may sound provocative but I am here to learn, not blindly criticize the model. I just explained it the way I currently see it.