Timeline for Difference between Wald test and Chi-squared test
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 18, 2020 at 5:42 | vote | accept | unicorn | ||
Feb 18, 2020 at 5:42 | vote | accept | unicorn | ||
Feb 18, 2020 at 5:42 | |||||
Feb 17, 2020 at 2:36 | vote | accept | unicorn | ||
Feb 18, 2020 at 5:42 | |||||
Feb 15, 2020 at 21:32 | history | edited | EdM | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed title, added tag
|
Feb 15, 2020 at 21:31 | answer | added | EdM | timeline score: 6 | |
Feb 5, 2020 at 12:21 | history | edited | unicorn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 9 characters in body; edited title
|
Feb 5, 2020 at 1:58 | comment | added | unicorn | I read about this post earlier. I understand that those three tests are somehow used in similar scenario under same assumption. And Chi-squared test is used under the same distribution as well. However, my impression is that Chi-squared test is more similar to Wald (at least from formula). But the post states that it is the same with score test if continuity correction does not applied. So I am still confused... | |
Feb 4, 2020 at 16:02 | comment | added | EdM | I think that this answer should help a lot, covering Wald tests, likelihood-ratio tests, and score tests. The score test is identical to a chi-square test without a continuity correction, as explained toward the end of the answer. Please look at that page and then edit this question to specify issues that you still might find confusing. | |
Feb 4, 2020 at 15:21 | comment | added | unicorn | Can anyone share some comments? Thanks | |
Feb 4, 2020 at 15:17 | history | edited | unicorn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body; edited title
|
Feb 4, 2020 at 5:32 | history | asked | unicorn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |