Timeline for Likelihood ratio, Wald, and Score are equivalent?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 25 at 15:59 | history | edited | Richard Hardy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
Sep 19, 2022 at 22:03 | vote | accept | Dave | ||
Jul 16, 2022 at 15:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackStats/status/1548321564596154373 | ||
Jul 15, 2022 at 16:11 | history | edited | Dave | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
Jul 15, 2022 at 14:57 | history | edited | kjetil b halvorsen♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 96 characters in body
|
Feb 13, 2020 at 16:14 | comment | added | Dave | "As $n \rightarrow \infty$, the [Wald, likelihood ratio, and Score] tests have certain asymptotic equivalences. For the best-known GLM, the normal linear model, the three types of inference provide identical results." My impression, evidently wrong, was that the three converged as $n \rightarrow \infty$ but differed for finite $n$...except for the normal linear model, where they gave the same results. I think this warrants a new question, but if even the normal linear model only has asymptotic equivalence, what equivalence does the normal linear have that GLM in general lacks? | |
Feb 13, 2020 at 16:09 | comment | added | AdamO | That's absolutely untrue. They are asymptotically equivalent, so unless $n=\infty$, they will differ a little bit. Small $n$? They can differ a LOT. | |
Feb 13, 2020 at 15:53 | answer | added | Christoph Hanck | timeline score: 6 | |
Feb 13, 2020 at 14:41 | history | asked | Dave | CC BY-SA 4.0 |