Timeline for Are mixed model results valid when several missing replicates?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 29, 2020 at 22:39 | vote | accept | Facu | ||
| Feb 29, 2020 at 19:48 | vote | accept | Facu | ||
| Feb 29, 2020 at 19:48 | |||||
| Feb 29, 2020 at 7:51 | answer | added | Dimitris Rizopoulos | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 29, 2020 at 1:31 | history | edited | Facu |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 28, 2020 at 14:50 | history | edited | Facu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 52 characters in body
|
| Feb 28, 2020 at 14:16 | history | edited | Facu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Feb 28, 2020 at 14:07 | history | edited | Facu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 443 characters in body
|
| Feb 28, 2020 at 13:50 | history | edited | Facu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 29 characters in body
|
| Feb 28, 2020 at 13:47 | comment | added | Facu | Thanks for the edit suggestion @ErikRuzek . I added the raw data. In fact, I have lost four samples in field during my summer trip. | |
| Feb 28, 2020 at 13:40 | history | edited | Facu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1479 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Feb 28, 2020 at 13:08 | comment | added | Erik Ruzek | "The problem is that I've lost some samples, conserving only one replicate for Exclosure situation in Summer time." You later say this seems systematic but is not. Please explain. Also, how is this missing represented in your data? Is there a row for this situation with the only missing value being on the response? | |
| Feb 28, 2020 at 13:01 | history | edited | kjetil b halvorsen♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited tags
|
| Feb 28, 2020 at 12:14 | history | edited | Facu |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 28, 2020 at 7:18 | history | migrated | from stackoverflow.com (revisions) | ||
| Feb 28, 2020 at 5:14 | history | asked | Facu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |