Timeline for How to deal with treatment variable which is determined by the outcome variable
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2020 at 21:50 | answer | added | Adrian Keister | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 3, 2020 at 21:38 | comment | added | Adrian Keister | I would strongly recommend that you think about a causal diagram. For example, you might or might not need to be controlling for some of the things you're controlling for. It depends on whether any of them set up a backdoor path - something much easier to determine with a causal diagram. | |
| Jun 3, 2020 at 21:35 | comment | added | Sher Afghan | @AdrianKeister The causality runs both ways. Crashes cause the message, and the message may also have effect on crashes in the current time period. It's a recursive setting $O\rightarrow M \rightarrow O$ | |
| Jun 3, 2020 at 21:32 | comment | added | Adrian Keister | If the message is determined by the outcome, $O\to M,$ then you don't have an endogeneity problem; you have a violation of the fundamental law of causality: causes must precede effects! | |
| Jun 1, 2020 at 18:31 | comment | added | Sher Afghan | Can anyone please help with this? Any ideas or thoughts you may have would help a lot | |
| May 31, 2020 at 6:00 | history | edited | Sher Afghan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed spelling
|
| May 25, 2020 at 15:14 | history | asked | Sher Afghan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |