Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 9, 2020 at 8:27 vote accept Star
Jun 8, 2020 at 22:14 answer added whuber timeline score: 1
Jun 6, 2020 at 17:52 comment added whuber @Dilip One need only adopt a relevant definition of "symmetric." For instance, the CDF of a random variable $X$ symmetric about a value $\mu$ satisfies $F_X(\mu+x)=1-F_X(\mu-x)$ for all real numbers $x$ where either of $\mu\pm x$ is a point of continuity.
Jun 6, 2020 at 8:19 comment added Star I have actually one more doubt related to how to prove the statement: am I using somewhere that the probability mass function or density of $Z$ is symmetric around zero?
Jun 6, 2020 at 8:16 comment added Star Thanks. I have corrected that part.
Jun 6, 2020 at 8:15 history edited Star CC BY-SA 4.0
added 78 characters in body
Jun 5, 2020 at 19:39 comment added Dilip Sarwate How can a CDF be symmetric about $0$? CDFs are non decreasing functions.
Jun 5, 2020 at 14:20 comment added whuber You can do that. However, your approach ignores the essential simplicity of the situation. I think you can obtain better insight by considering the more general situation where $F$ is a mixture of arbitrary distributions and $G$ is also an arbitrary distribution. Then (adopting a suggestive meta-notation), you can write a mixture as $F=\sum_i \pi_iF_i$ and, using $\star$ for the distribution arising from summing the underlying random variables, compute $$F\star G = \left(\sum_i \pi_iF_i\right)\star G = \sum_i\pi_i\left(F_i\star G\right),$$ QED.
Jun 5, 2020 at 14:11 comment added Star Is it correct they way in which I go from $g$ to $G$? Can I do that?
Jun 5, 2020 at 14:11 comment added Star This is my attempt following your suggestion. Consider for simplicity the case where $Y$ and $Z$ are discrete. If $Y$ and $Z$ are independent, then the probability mass function of $X\equiv Y+Z$ evaluated at $x$ is $\sum_{l=-\infty}^\infty Pr(Y=l)Pr(Z=x-l)=\sum_{j=1}^J \lambda_j g(x-\mu_j)$, where $g$ is the probability mass function associated with the CDF $G$. In turn, the CDF of $X$ evaluated at $x$ is $\sum_{j=1}^J \lambda_j G(x-\mu_j)$.
Jun 5, 2020 at 14:07 comment added whuber Simply convolve the distributions. Because convolution is a linear operator, a mixture input becomes a mixture output. This is practically a tautology, but its basic simplicity suggests that a mindless application of the definitions will take you directly to your goal.
Jun 5, 2020 at 13:50 history edited Star CC BY-SA 4.0
added 58 characters in body
Jun 5, 2020 at 13:38 history asked Star CC BY-SA 4.0