Skip to main content
added 68 characters in body
Source Link
sesqu
  • 691
  • 7
  • 7

It seems to me that if $f$ is strictly monotonic, $m \circ f=f \circ m$, but when it is nonlinear,and the question reduces to $\mu \circ f \ne f \circ \mu$$\mu\circ f>f\circ\mu$, which is covered by Jensen's inequality. ThoseSo strict convexity and strict monotonicity together would be like a sufficient condition, at least.

It seems to me that if $f$ is strictly monotonic, $m \circ f=f \circ m$, but when it is nonlinear, $\mu \circ f \ne f \circ \mu$. Those would be like a sufficient condition, at least.

It seems to me that if $f$ is strictly monotonic, $m \circ f=f \circ m$, and the question reduces to $\mu\circ f>f\circ\mu$, which is covered by Jensen's inequality. So strict convexity and strict monotonicity together would be a sufficient condition.

deleted 1 characters in body
Source Link
whuber
  • 333.6k
  • 63
  • 792
  • 1.3k

It seems to me that if $f$ is strictly monotonousmonotonic, $m \circ f=f \circ m$, but when it is nonlinear, $\mu \circ f \ne f \circ \mu$. Those would be like a sufficient condition, at least.

It seems to me that if $f$ is strictly monotonous, $m \circ f=f \circ m$, but when it is nonlinear, $\mu \circ f \ne f \circ \mu$. Those would be like a sufficient condition, at least.

It seems to me that if $f$ is strictly monotonic, $m \circ f=f \circ m$, but when it is nonlinear, $\mu \circ f \ne f \circ \mu$. Those would be like a sufficient condition, at least.

Source Link
sesqu
  • 691
  • 7
  • 7

It seems to me that if $f$ is strictly monotonous, $m \circ f=f \circ m$, but when it is nonlinear, $\mu \circ f \ne f \circ \mu$. Those would be like a sufficient condition, at least.