Timeline for ANOVA gives small effect yet significant p
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2020 at 16:18 | history | edited | Randcelot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 97 characters in body
|
| Jul 16, 2020 at 16:04 | comment | added | Randcelot | Oh you're totally right, I totally skimmed over the 20 people part. I clearly should not be trying to help at 2 am lol | |
| Jul 16, 2020 at 12:45 | comment | added | dbwilson | This answer is correct. However, in this situation the sample size is small (n=20). I'm not sure how ezANOVA is computing Hedges' g for the within-subjects effects -- this is not as straightforward as it may seem. Focus on the raw mean differences. Are they big? Also, try using R's "aov" function to see if you get the same results. | |
| Jul 16, 2020 at 7:19 | history | migrated | from stackoverflow.com (revisions) | ||
| Jul 16, 2020 at 5:10 | history | answered | Randcelot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |