Skip to main content
16 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Jan 22, 2013 at 9:04 history edited chl CC BY-SA 3.0
corrected spelling; improved formatting
S Jan 22, 2013 at 9:04 history suggested rcs CC BY-SA 3.0
corrected spelling; improved formatting
Jan 22, 2013 at 7:47 review Suggested edits
Jan 22, 2013 at 9:04
Jan 21, 2013 at 13:02 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackStats/status/293342917043560448
Jan 21, 2013 at 12:36 answer added Günal timeline score: 1
Jan 21, 2013 at 12:16 answer added IMA timeline score: 1
Jan 21, 2013 at 11:48 comment added Peter Flom I fixed up the formatting, but do you really mean to have $C_0$ five times? This would be most unusual; I think you want $C_1$, $C_2$ etc. Also, you didn't include an intercept; was that deliberate?
S Jan 21, 2013 at 11:45 history edited Peter Flom CC BY-SA 3.0
Improved formatting.
S Jan 21, 2013 at 11:45 history suggested Sven Hohenstein CC BY-SA 3.0
Improved formatting.
Jan 21, 2013 at 8:46 review Suggested edits
Jan 21, 2013 at 11:45
Jan 21, 2013 at 8:26 comment added user19869 no problem....linear model's a start...right now I get negative values for one of the coefficients, which I can't have.
Jan 21, 2013 at 8:21 comment added IMA Oh I completely misunderstood you then. Sorry. May I ask: Is the linear model necessarily appropriate? What results do you get when estimating right now?
Jan 21, 2013 at 8:17 comment added user19869 I'm trying to fit some biological data, and need to constrain the coefficients such that they are not nonsensical...
Jan 21, 2013 at 8:07 review First posts
Jan 21, 2013 at 8:46
Jan 21, 2013 at 8:07 comment added IMA What is the reason to constrain the ranges? If it is just a technical question you should maybe ask on stackoverflow, since this is more of a stats theoretical site. If the reason for constraint is a inheret to your model, I'd advise you to consider a (semi)-logarithmic model depending on what you are doing. Cutting out data point entirely tends to be a really bad idea for inference.
Jan 21, 2013 at 7:49 history asked user19869 CC BY-SA 3.0