Skip to main content
added 33 characters in body
Source Link
Sycorax
  • 94.1k
  • 23
  • 236
  • 390

So far, no answer has addressed the core conceptual difference between logistic regression and neural networks.

Logistic regression is a convex optimization problem.

When the design matrix is full rank and the data do not exhibit separation, logistic regression is strongly convex with a unique, finite minimizer. This means that a suitable optimization method will be able to recover the same minimizer across repeated runtsruns, because there's only one minimum. These threads develop this topic in more detail.

In general, neural networks are not a convex minimization problem. A core feature of a non-convex problem is that it has more than one minimum, possibly even multiple global minima. Multiple minima imply that a minimization scheme is susceptible to finding different solutions across different runs, especially when there is random component (random initialization, mini-batched training) to the optimization procedure. These threads develop this topic in more detail.

Examples strongly convex neural networks arise from special cases. The simplest example of a strongly convex neural network is the neural network with no hidden layers and a monotonic activation for the output of the single linear output layer. These networks are identically generalized linear models (logistic regression, OLS, etc.). In particular, logistic regression is a generalized linear model () in the sense that the logit of the estimated probability response is a linear function of the parameters. See: Why is logistic regression a linear model?

So far, no answer has addressed the core conceptual difference between logistic regression and neural networks.

Logistic regression is a convex optimization problem.

When the design matrix is full rank and the data do not exhibit separation, logistic regression is strongly convex with a unique, finite minimizer. This means that a suitable optimization method will be able to recover the same minimizer across repeated runts. These threads develop this topic in more detail.

In general, neural networks are not a convex minimization problem. A core feature of a non-convex problem is that it has more than one minimum, possibly even multiple global minima. Multiple minima imply that a minimization scheme is susceptible to finding different solutions across different runs, especially when there is random component (random initialization, mini-batched training) to the optimization procedure. These threads develop this topic in more detail.

Examples strongly convex neural networks arise from special cases. The simplest example of a strongly convex neural network is the neural network with no hidden layers and a monotonic activation for the output of the single linear output layer. These networks are identically generalized linear models (logistic regression, OLS, etc.). In particular, logistic regression is a generalized linear model () in the sense that the logit of the estimated probability response is a linear function of the parameters. See: Why is logistic regression a linear model?

So far, no answer has addressed the core conceptual difference between logistic regression and neural networks.

Logistic regression is a convex optimization problem.

When the design matrix is full rank and the data do not exhibit separation, logistic regression is strongly convex with a unique, finite minimizer. This means that a suitable optimization method will be able to recover the same minimizer across repeated runs, because there's only one minimum. These threads develop this topic in more detail.

In general, neural networks are not a convex minimization problem. A core feature of a non-convex problem is that it has more than one minimum, possibly even multiple global minima. Multiple minima imply that a minimization scheme is susceptible to finding different solutions across different runs, especially when there is random component (random initialization, mini-batched training) to the optimization procedure. These threads develop this topic in more detail.

Examples strongly convex neural networks arise from special cases. The simplest example of a strongly convex neural network is the neural network with no hidden layers and a monotonic activation for the output of the single linear output layer. These networks are identically generalized linear models (logistic regression, OLS, etc.). In particular, logistic regression is a generalized linear model () in the sense that the logit of the estimated probability response is a linear function of the parameters. See: Why is logistic regression a linear model?

deleted 34 characters in body
Source Link
Sycorax
  • 94.1k
  • 23
  • 236
  • 390

So far, no answer has addressed the core conceptual difference between logistic regression and neural networks.

Logistic regression is a convex optimization problem.

When the design matrix is full rank and the data do not exhibit separation, logistic regression is strongly convex with a unique, finite minimizer. This means that a suitable optimization method will be able to recover the same minimizer across repeated runts. These threads develop this topic in more detail.

In general, neural networks are not a convex minimization problem. A core feature of a non-convex problem is that it has more than one minimum, possibly even multiple global minima. Multiple minima imply that a minimization scheme is susceptible to finding different solutions across different runs, especially when there is random component (random initialization, mini-batched training) to the optimization procedure. These threads develop this topic in more detail.

The only neural networks which areExamples strongly convex are the ones where the parameters (weights, biases) are uniquely identifiedneural networks arise from special cases. The simplest examplesexample of thisa strongly convex neural network is the neural network with no hidden layers and a monotonic activation for the output of the single linear output layer. These networks are identically generalized linear models (logistic regression, OLS, etc.). In particular, logistic regression is a generalized linear model () in the sense that the logit of the estimated probability response is a linear function of the parameters. See: Why is logistic regression a linear model?

So far, no answer has addressed the core conceptual difference between logistic regression and neural networks.

Logistic regression is a convex optimization problem.

When the design matrix is full rank and the data do not exhibit separation, logistic regression is strongly convex with a unique, finite minimizer. This means that a suitable optimization method will be able to recover the same minimizer across repeated runts. These threads develop this topic in more detail.

In general, neural networks are not a convex minimization problem. A core feature of a non-convex problem is that it has more than one minimum, possibly even multiple global minima. Multiple minima imply that a minimization scheme is susceptible to finding different solutions across different runs, especially when there is random component (random initialization, mini-batched training) to the optimization procedure. These threads develop this topic in more detail.

The only neural networks which are strongly convex are the ones where the parameters (weights, biases) are uniquely identified. The simplest examples of this is the neural network with no hidden layers and a monotonic activation for the output of the single linear output layer. These networks are identically generalized linear models (logistic regression, OLS, etc.). In particular, logistic regression is a generalized linear model () in the sense that the logit of the estimated probability response is a linear function of the parameters. See: Why is logistic regression a linear model?

So far, no answer has addressed the core conceptual difference between logistic regression and neural networks.

Logistic regression is a convex optimization problem.

When the design matrix is full rank and the data do not exhibit separation, logistic regression is strongly convex with a unique, finite minimizer. This means that a suitable optimization method will be able to recover the same minimizer across repeated runts. These threads develop this topic in more detail.

In general, neural networks are not a convex minimization problem. A core feature of a non-convex problem is that it has more than one minimum, possibly even multiple global minima. Multiple minima imply that a minimization scheme is susceptible to finding different solutions across different runs, especially when there is random component (random initialization, mini-batched training) to the optimization procedure. These threads develop this topic in more detail.

Examples strongly convex neural networks arise from special cases. The simplest example of a strongly convex neural network is the neural network with no hidden layers and a monotonic activation for the output of the single linear output layer. These networks are identically generalized linear models (logistic regression, OLS, etc.). In particular, logistic regression is a generalized linear model () in the sense that the logit of the estimated probability response is a linear function of the parameters. See: Why is logistic regression a linear model?

added 38 characters in body
Source Link
Sycorax
  • 94.1k
  • 23
  • 236
  • 390

So far, no answer has addressed the core conceptual difference between logistic regression and neural networks.

Logistic regression is a convex optimization problem.

When the design matrix is full rank and the data do not exhibit separation, logistic regression is strongly convex with a unique, finite minimizer. This means that a suitable optimization method will be able to recover the same minimizer across repeated runts. These threads develop this topic in more detail.

In general, neural networks are not a convex minimization problem. A core feature of a non-convex problem is that it has more than one minimum, possibly even multiple global minima. Multiple minima imply that a minimization scheme is susceptible to finding different solutions across different runs, especially when there is random component (random initialization, mini-batched training) to the optimization procedure. These threads develop this topic in more detail.

The only neural networks which are strongly convex are the ones where the parameters (weights, biases) are uniquely identified. The simplest examples of this is the neural network with no hidden layers and a monotonic activation for the output of the single linear output layer. These networks are identically generalized linear models (logistic regression, OLS, etc.). In particular, logistic regression is a lineargeneralized linear model () in the sense that the logit of the estimated probability response is a linear function of the parameters. See: Why is logistic regression a linear model?

So far, no answer has addressed the core conceptual difference between logistic regression and neural networks.

Logistic regression is a convex optimization problem.

When the design matrix is full rank and the data do not exhibit separation, logistic regression is strongly convex with a unique, finite minimizer. This means that a suitable optimization method will be able to recover the same minimizer across repeated runts. These threads develop this topic in more detail.

In general, neural networks are not a convex minimization problem. A core feature of a non-convex problem is that it has more than one minimum, possibly even multiple global minima. Multiple minima imply that a minimization scheme is susceptible to finding different solutions across different runs, especially when there is random component (random initialization, mini-batched training) to the optimization procedure. These threads develop this topic in more detail.

The only neural networks which are strongly convex are the ones where the parameters (weights, biases) are uniquely identified. The simplest examples of this is the neural network with no hidden layers and a monotonic activation for the output of the single linear output layer. These networks are identically linear models (logistic regression, OLS, etc.). In particular, logistic regression is a linear model in the sense that the logit of the estimated probability response is a linear function of the parameters. See: Why is logistic regression a linear model?

So far, no answer has addressed the core conceptual difference between logistic regression and neural networks.

Logistic regression is a convex optimization problem.

When the design matrix is full rank and the data do not exhibit separation, logistic regression is strongly convex with a unique, finite minimizer. This means that a suitable optimization method will be able to recover the same minimizer across repeated runts. These threads develop this topic in more detail.

In general, neural networks are not a convex minimization problem. A core feature of a non-convex problem is that it has more than one minimum, possibly even multiple global minima. Multiple minima imply that a minimization scheme is susceptible to finding different solutions across different runs, especially when there is random component (random initialization, mini-batched training) to the optimization procedure. These threads develop this topic in more detail.

The only neural networks which are strongly convex are the ones where the parameters (weights, biases) are uniquely identified. The simplest examples of this is the neural network with no hidden layers and a monotonic activation for the output of the single linear output layer. These networks are identically generalized linear models (logistic regression, OLS, etc.). In particular, logistic regression is a generalized linear model () in the sense that the logit of the estimated probability response is a linear function of the parameters. See: Why is logistic regression a linear model?

added 39 characters in body
Source Link
Sycorax
  • 94.1k
  • 23
  • 236
  • 390
Loading
added 352 characters in body
Source Link
Sycorax
  • 94.1k
  • 23
  • 236
  • 390
Loading
Source Link
Sycorax
  • 94.1k
  • 23
  • 236
  • 390
Loading