Timeline for Creating conditional probability distribution
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2013 at 22:31 | history | edited | user88 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Feb 4, 2013 at 17:15 | history | edited | user1243255 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 167 characters in body
|
| Feb 4, 2013 at 16:36 | history | edited | user1243255 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 646 characters in body
|
| Feb 4, 2013 at 14:35 | vote | accept | user1243255 | ||
| Feb 4, 2013 at 13:41 | vote | accept | user1243255 | ||
| Feb 4, 2013 at 13:49 | |||||
| Feb 4, 2013 at 7:13 | answer | added | Corvus | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 3, 2013 at 23:22 | history | edited | user1243255 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 224 characters in body
|
| Feb 3, 2013 at 23:08 | comment | added | Corvus | Be careful what you do with the results then. For example, if it were the case that after B became 1, it hung around at 1 for 30 seconds, then the probability you get from a naive method will very biased if interpreted as the "probability that any randomly chosen location with A=1 is currently in B=1 at any given time". However, if your intention is only to apply this result to exactly the same data collection algorithm in the future, then it should be OK. | |
| Feb 3, 2013 at 22:53 | comment | added | user1243255 | We do not know/care cause our signal gatherer just hits those locations every 10 seconds and sees whether location is alive or not and moves on but we do know that B is caused by A just by design of logic. | |
| Feb 3, 2013 at 22:51 | comment | added | Corvus | So neither A nor B "stick" and hang around for a while? Your example shows a sequential string of A's - just coincidence? | |
| Feb 3, 2013 at 22:48 | answer | added | Arthur Small | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 3, 2013 at 22:30 | comment | added | user1243255 | Each visit is independent but B depends on A due to way logic is built. | |
| Feb 3, 2013 at 22:26 | comment | added | Corvus | What is wrong with simpky counting up the occurrences in a frequency table? Are your data independent samples? Do you have any reason to fear selection biases? Is each visit independent or is there strong autocorrelation here? | |
| Feb 3, 2013 at 22:16 | history | asked | user1243255 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |