Skip to main content
added 72 characters in body
Source Link
Sextus Empiricus
  • 86.5k
  • 6
  • 115
  • 302

This curve looks less bad when you switch the axes.

axes switched

For each given predicted value (currently on the y-axis), you see more or less as many true values above and below (right and left on the x-axis).

So the model is not so much biased.


Related is this example of linear regression from this question/answer

example

You can fit X versus Y or Y versus X.

Due to regression dilution you get that the regression lines are a bit flat (less steep). The one curve represents E(X|Y) and the other curve represents E(Y|X). If you switch their roles then the curves will be biased for high/low values.

This switching of roles is what also happens in your image. Your curve gives an estimate of the expected true value conditional on the regressor. The true values (on the horizontal/x-axis) seem to be more or less evenly distributed around the predicted mean (you have to compare left/right for this and not up/down).

This curve looks less bad when you switch the axes.

For each given predicted value (currently on the y-axis), you see more or less as many true values above and below (right and left on the x-axis).

So the model is not so much biased.


Related is this example of linear regression from this question/answer

example

You can fit X versus Y or Y versus X.

Due to regression dilution you get that the regression lines are a bit flat (less steep). The one curve represents E(X|Y) and the other curve represents E(Y|X). If you switch their roles then the curves will be biased for high/low values.

This switching of roles is what also happens in your image. Your curve gives an estimate of the expected true value conditional on the regressor. The true values (on the horizontal/x-axis) seem to be more or less evenly distributed around the predicted mean (you have to compare left/right for this and not up/down).

This curve looks less bad when you switch the axes.

axes switched

For each given predicted value (currently on the y-axis), you see more or less as many true values above and below (right and left on the x-axis).

So the model is not so much biased.


Related is this example of linear regression from this question/answer

example

You can fit X versus Y or Y versus X.

Due to regression dilution you get that the regression lines are a bit flat (less steep). The one curve represents E(X|Y) and the other curve represents E(Y|X). If you switch their roles then the curves will be biased for high/low values.

This switching of roles is what also happens in your image. Your curve gives an estimate of the expected true value conditional on the regressor. The true values (on the horizontal/x-axis) seem to be more or less evenly distributed around the predicted mean (you have to compare left/right for this and not up/down).

added 82 characters in body
Source Link
Sextus Empiricus
  • 86.5k
  • 6
  • 115
  • 302

This curve looks less bad when you switch the axisaxes.

For each given predicted value (currently on the y-axis), you see more or less as many true values above and below (leftright and rightleft on the x-axis).

So the model is not so much biased.


Related is this example of linear regression from this question/answer

example

You can fit X versus Y or Y versus X.

Due to regression dilution you get that the regression lines are a bit flat (less steep). The one curve represents E(X|Y) and the other curve represents E(Y|X). If you switch their rollsroles then theythe curves will be biased for high/low values.

This switching of roles is what also happens in your image. Your curve gives an estimate of the expected true value conditional on the regressor. The true values (on the horizontal/x-axis) seem to be well more or less evenly distributed left/right around the predicted mean (you have to compare left/right for this and not up/down).

This curve looks less bad when you switch the axis.

For each given predicted value (currently on the y-axis), you see more or less as many true values above and below (left and right on the x-axis).

So the model is not so much biased.


Related is this example of linear regression from this question/answer

example

You can fit X versus Y or Y versus X.

Due to regression dilution you get that the regression lines are a bit flat. The one curve represents E(X|Y) and the other E(Y|X). If you switch their rolls then they will be biased.

This switching is what also happens in your image. Your curve gives an estimate of the expected true value conditional on the regressor. The true values (on the horizontal/x-axis seem to be well more or less evenly distributed left/right around the predicted mean)

This curve looks less bad when you switch the axes.

For each given predicted value (currently on the y-axis), you see more or less as many true values above and below (right and left on the x-axis).

So the model is not so much biased.


Related is this example of linear regression from this question/answer

example

You can fit X versus Y or Y versus X.

Due to regression dilution you get that the regression lines are a bit flat (less steep). The one curve represents E(X|Y) and the other curve represents E(Y|X). If you switch their roles then the curves will be biased for high/low values.

This switching of roles is what also happens in your image. Your curve gives an estimate of the expected true value conditional on the regressor. The true values (on the horizontal/x-axis) seem to be more or less evenly distributed around the predicted mean (you have to compare left/right for this and not up/down).

added 756 characters in body
Source Link
Sextus Empiricus
  • 86.5k
  • 6
  • 115
  • 302

This curve looks less bad when you switch the axis.

For each given predicted value (currently on the y-axis), you see more or less as many true values above and below (left and right on the x-axis).

So the model is not so much biased.


Related is this example of linear regression from this question/answer

example

You can fit X versus Y or Y versus X.

Due to regression dilution you get that the regression lines are a bit flat. The one curve represents E(X|Y) and the other E(Y|X). If you switch their rolls then they will be biased.

This switching is what also happens in your image. Your curve gives an estimate of the expected true value conditional on the regressor. The true values (on the horizontal/x-axis seem to be well more or less evenly distributed left/right around the predicted mean)

This curve looks less bad when you switch the axis.

For each given predicted value (currently on the y-axis), you see more or less as many true values above and below (left and right on the x-axis).

So the model is not so much biased.

This curve looks less bad when you switch the axis.

For each given predicted value (currently on the y-axis), you see more or less as many true values above and below (left and right on the x-axis).

So the model is not so much biased.


Related is this example of linear regression from this question/answer

example

You can fit X versus Y or Y versus X.

Due to regression dilution you get that the regression lines are a bit flat. The one curve represents E(X|Y) and the other E(Y|X). If you switch their rolls then they will be biased.

This switching is what also happens in your image. Your curve gives an estimate of the expected true value conditional on the regressor. The true values (on the horizontal/x-axis seem to be well more or less evenly distributed left/right around the predicted mean)

Source Link
Sextus Empiricus
  • 86.5k
  • 6
  • 115
  • 302
Loading