Skip to main content
added 59 characters in body
Source Link
POC
  • 688
  • 1
  • 10
  • 26

If you have no theoretical model to support your analysis, reporting the saturated model without fit statsticsstatistics seems the best option. Removing non-significant results will gives you artificially good fitsfit statistics, just because you developdeveloped the model in a statistics fashion (removing non significant path) rather than a theoretical one (justified conceptually).

If you have no theoretical model to support your analysis, reporting the saturated model without fit statstics seems the best option. Removing non-significant results will gives you artificially good fits statistics, just because you develop the model in a statistics fashion rather than a theoretical one.

If you have no theoretical model to support your analysis, reporting the saturated model without fit statistics seems the best option. Removing non-significant results will gives you artificially good fit statistics, just because you developed the model in a statistics fashion (removing non significant path) rather than a theoretical one (justified conceptually).

Source Link
POC
  • 688
  • 1
  • 10
  • 26

If you have no theoretical model to support your analysis, reporting the saturated model without fit statstics seems the best option. Removing non-significant results will gives you artificially good fits statistics, just because you develop the model in a statistics fashion rather than a theoretical one.