Timeline for Making sense of the $\phi_k$ correlation coefficient
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2023 at 11:51 | comment | added | Scope | I have the same question | |
| Jun 30, 2022 at 8:59 | vote | accept | 0x90 | ||
| Jan 6, 2022 at 12:59 | comment | added | LoesB | I still find myself confused of the interpretation of the significance with phi_k. In the documented research it is stated on p.23: 'Compared with the correlation matrix of Fig. 3, the low phi_k values happen to be statistically insignificant, but the higher values are very significant.' Is it generally true that solely Z-scores > 5 / Z-scores < -5 are truly significant? Or are |Z-scores|> 2.5 also significant. More general, how is this threshold determined. Thanks! | |
| Mar 10, 2021 at 10:25 | history | edited | Igor F. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Improved formatting
|
| Mar 10, 2021 at 8:09 | review | Late answers | |||
| Mar 10, 2021 at 8:13 | |||||
| Mar 10, 2021 at 8:04 | history | edited | Max Baak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 47 characters in body
|
| Mar 10, 2021 at 7:57 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 10, 2021 at 10:25 | |||||
| Mar 10, 2021 at 7:53 | history | answered | Max Baak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |