Skip to main content
Cross Validated

Return to Answer

added 2 characters in body
Source Link
Dave
Dave
  • 67.2k
  • 7
  • 105
  • 305

The correct answer is to ask the journal how to proceed.

Regarding the statistics, you don’t what the exact p-value is. Remember that tthe p-value is some kind of integral of a density. When you get out that far in the tail of a density, the numerical methods break down, and the value gets sensitive to violations of test assumptions. Is is $10^{-16}$ or $10^{-17}$ or $10^{-14}?$ Who knows!? But it also does not matter. The number you’re getting is R’s way of telling you that the answer is basically zero.

The correct answer is to ask the journal how to proceed.

Regarding the statistics, you don’t what the exact p-value is. Remember that t p-value is some kind of integral of a density. When you get out that far in the tail of a density, the numerical methods break down, and the value gets sensitive to violations of test assumptions. Is is $10^{-16}$ or $10^{-17}$ or $10^{-14}?$ Who knows!? But it also does not matter. The number you’re getting is R’s way of telling you that the answer is basically zero.

The correct answer is to ask the journal how to proceed.

Regarding the statistics, you don’t what the exact p-value is. Remember that the p-value is some kind of integral of a density. When you get out that far in the tail of a density, the numerical methods break down, and the value gets sensitive to violations of test assumptions. Is is $10^{-16}$ or $10^{-17}$ or $10^{-14}?$ Who knows!? But it also does not matter. The number you’re getting is R’s way of telling you that the answer is basically zero.

added 64 characters in body
Source Link
Dave
Dave
  • 67.2k
  • 7
  • 105
  • 305

The correct answer is to ask the journal how to proceed.

Regarding the statistics, you don’t what the exact p-value is. Remember that t p-value is some kind of integral of a density. When you get out that far in the tail of a density, the numerical methods break down, and the value gets sensitive to violations of test assumptions. Is is $10^{-16}$ or $10^{-17}$ or $10^{-14}?$ Who knows!? But it also does not matter. The number you’re getting is R’s way of telling you that the answer is basically zero.

The correct answer is to ask the journal how to proceed.

Regarding the statistics, you don’t what the exact p-value is. Remember that t p-value is some kind of integral of a density. When you get out that far in the tail of a density, the numerical methods break down. Is is $10^{-16}$ or $10^{-17}$ or $10^{-14}?$ Who knows!? But it also does not matter. The number you’re getting is R’s way of telling you that the answer is basically zero.

The correct answer is to ask the journal how to proceed.

Regarding the statistics, you don’t what the exact p-value is. Remember that t p-value is some kind of integral of a density. When you get out that far in the tail of a density, the numerical methods break down, and the value gets sensitive to violations of test assumptions. Is is $10^{-16}$ or $10^{-17}$ or $10^{-14}?$ Who knows!? But it also does not matter. The number you’re getting is R’s way of telling you that the answer is basically zero.

Source Link
Dave
Dave
  • 67.2k
  • 7
  • 105
  • 305

The correct answer is to ask the journal how to proceed.

Regarding the statistics, you don’t what the exact p-value is. Remember that t p-value is some kind of integral of a density. When you get out that far in the tail of a density, the numerical methods break down. Is is $10^{-16}$ or $10^{-17}$ or $10^{-14}?$ Who knows!? But it also does not matter. The number you’re getting is R’s way of telling you that the answer is basically zero.