Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 13 at 15:55 comment added kl-higgins I have similar "distance to" ecological analysis and I am weighing the pros and cons of NLS vs. GAM. I have gone through your paper and find that you decided to stick with the GAMs for the non-linear relationships. I am perplexed however that your description of the relationship canopy volume vs distance to waterhole is "canopy volume [...] increased initially with distance from the nearest waterhole, before plateauing at around 1000 m (Fig. 3a and b)." However, plateauing behaviour is not what your GAM is showing but what an asymptotic regression would have showed. Details why?
Jul 11, 2021 at 15:30 vote accept Luke Wilson
Jul 10, 2021 at 20:21 history became hot network question
Jul 10, 2021 at 15:33 comment added usεr11852 You have done well using GAMs, the reviewer's comment seems somewhat over-simplifying to me.
Jul 10, 2021 at 15:31 answer added usεr11852 timeline score: 20
Jul 10, 2021 at 15:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackStats/status/1413875686134239233
Jul 10, 2021 at 13:37 answer added Demetri Pananos timeline score: 13
Jul 10, 2021 at 12:19 history asked Luke Wilson CC BY-SA 4.0