Timeline for Structural equation modeling vs. mixed effects model
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2021 at 5:38 | answer | added | Jeremy Miles | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 18, 2021 at 12:58 | history | edited | user332641 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 290 characters in body
|
| Aug 18, 2021 at 12:49 | comment | added | user332641 | @WayneB 2 times and it's an option to look at the changes but I didn't mention that to avoid making it more complicated - but an ideal full analysis of everything we have would include analyzing how the change in volume between these two years impacts/explains the change in performance. The tests are all the same for each subject and also for each of the two time points (there are a handful of different tests that everyone does at each timpoint, I thought about doing the same analysis once for each) | |
| Aug 18, 2021 at 9:12 | comment | added | Robert Long | How many times do subjects perform the test(s) ? Are the tests the same each time ? Are they the tests the same for each subject? | |
| Aug 18, 2021 at 9:02 | comment | added | Eoin | As described, your analysis doesn't need SEM or mixed effects modelling. Multiple linear regression, with test performance as the outcome and brain volume, age, sex, and education level as predictors, will answer your question. | |
| Aug 18, 2021 at 8:50 | review | First posts | |||
| Aug 18, 2021 at 9:29 | |||||
| Aug 18, 2021 at 8:45 | history | asked | user332641 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |