Timeline for Interpretation of two dummies interacted with one continuous variable
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2023 at 7:01 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jul 31, 2023 at 1:08 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Mar 31, 2023 at 22:04 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Feb 1, 2022 at 22:13 | answer | added | EdM | timeline score: 1 | |
| S Feb 1, 2022 at 5:58 | history | suggested | Alisa | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added STATA equation and results based on Noah's comment.
|
| Feb 1, 2022 at 1:53 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Feb 1, 2022 at 5:58 | |||||
| Jan 29, 2022 at 4:18 | history | edited | kjetil b halvorsen♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited tags
|
| Jan 27, 2022 at 20:56 | comment | added | Noah |
If you are using Stata, you should find that using ## creates not only the 3-way interaction but also all the 2-way interactions and "main" effects. So, you will have 3 more coefficients in your model than you have included (not including the intercept). These additional terms in the model are essential for interpreting the coefficient on the 3-way interaction. Please clarify this, perhaps including the regression output so we can help interpret specific numbers.
|
|
| S Jan 27, 2022 at 19:48 | review | First questions | |||
| Jan 28, 2022 at 0:01 | |||||
| S Jan 27, 2022 at 19:48 | history | asked | Alisa | CC BY-SA 4.0 |