Timeline for why I am getting TP and FP in confusion matrix is 0, how to get it right?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2023 at 18:26 | comment | added | Dave |
It's not at all obvious that class imbalance is a problem that requires the modeler to mess with the data (such as with sklearn sampling techniques). Please refer to my answer and the links in it.
|
|
| Mar 28, 2022 at 5:06 | comment | added | Atul Mishra | So, now you can see that as soon as you used a more extensive model, the RF was able to pick up some pattern, so yes definitely RF performed better than Logistic. I would recommend you to check for class imbalance and then try to approach the ML method. Upvote the answer if it helped.😄 | |
| Mar 28, 2022 at 4:58 | comment | added | Abhishek Pandey | thanks for your useful response, one more thing want to share, the above confusion matrix which i shared earlier had no tp and fp this was the logistic regression, but when i used random forest i got tp and fp , 6 and 31, it is ok or this model is not working. | |
| Mar 25, 2022 at 8:31 | history | answered | Atul Mishra | CC BY-SA 4.0 |