Timeline for How to test a treatment had a positive effect on the experimental group?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2022 at 19:59 | comment | added | dipetkov | Because of this difference among the tasks, it's not clear what the two parameters $\mu_0$ and $\mu_1$ represent. Since your data consists of successes and failures, it's more natural to think in terms of probability of success and to let each task has its own probability of success. Perhaps both the tasks and the subjects can be modeled as random effects. You'd need the full data for this analysis. | |
| Jun 6, 2022 at 19:59 | comment | added | dipetkov | The 10 tasks are obviously not interchangeable: there seems to be 4 hard tasks and 5 easy tasks. Note that simple tasks are not very informative because of a ceiling effect. The 0 in for the third task in the c1 group looks suspicious. The fact that controls do poorly on the fifth task is also interesting but maybe is due to chance because there are only 6 subjects per group. | |
| Jun 2, 2022 at 5:53 | history | edited | Nick | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 59 characters in body
|
| Jun 2, 2022 at 1:06 | answer | added | pep | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 2, 2022 at 0:37 | history | asked | Nick | CC BY-SA 4.0 |