Timeline for ANOVA result indicated that there were sig. differences while Tukey post-hoc test revealed that there were no statistically sig. differences
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2022 at 11:33 | comment | added | Federico Tedeschi | I'd say that the two means with the largest difference are the most likely culprit, but you still don't have evidence if significance is only found in the "omnibus" test. | |
| Nov 2, 2021 at 11:27 | history | edited | COOLSerdash | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:44 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://stats.stackexchange.com/ with https://stats.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Feb 27, 2015 at 1:53 | comment | added | Speldosa | Well, couldn't you at least surmise that there was a difference between the two means with the largest difference between them? Since the null hypothesis of the ANOVA is that at least one pair of means differs from each other. | |
| May 13, 2013 at 14:40 | comment | added | Yasser Al-Qadhi | Thank you very much for your respnde, my research question is to identify the level of Knowledge sharing among emloyees based on thier demographic data. on of this demographic data is age. | |
| May 13, 2013 at 9:01 | history | edited | COOLSerdash | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| May 13, 2013 at 8:45 | history | answered | COOLSerdash | CC BY-SA 3.0 |