Timeline for Does statistically simple algos qualify as AI algos?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2022 at 15:31 | comment | added | Jen | No, not inappropriate, in my opinion, but potentially should include a caveat: that it's a "clustering" or "grouping" algorithm. These kinds of algorithms are often found in texts titled "Artificial Intelligence", especially older ones, but, it's not the first thing that comes to mind for people with a more limited or superficial exposure to the field. You're right to be careful about the language you use. Calling something "artificial intelligence" could be overselling something depending on the background of the audience. Statistical clustering algorithm would be absolutely appropriate. | |
| Sep 19, 2022 at 15:21 | comment | added | The Great | thanks for the response. Since there is no universally accepted definition, calling jenks breaks as AI algo wouldn't be highly inappropriate? I don't wish to oversell something. Hence, I was confused. What would be a better and appropriate terms to use for such algos (just statistical algos)? | |
| Sep 19, 2022 at 15:17 | vote | accept | The Great | ||
| Sep 19, 2022 at 14:55 | comment | added | Dave | Welcome to Cross Validated! This is really the only answer. +1 | |
| Sep 19, 2022 at 14:54 | history | edited | Jen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| S Sep 19, 2022 at 14:54 | review | First answers | |||
| Sep 19, 2022 at 15:18 | |||||
| S Sep 19, 2022 at 14:54 | history | answered | Jen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |