Timeline for Proper notation for Random Matrix and observation
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2022 at 13:53 | vote | accept | Renato Fernandes | ||
| Nov 9, 2022 at 13:04 | comment | added | utobi | It does work also for non identically cases, although I'm not sure how this is useful there. In mean, in multivariate analysis $\mathbb{X}$ is useful because, .e.g., I can express the sample average say as $\bar x = (1/n)\mathbb{X}^\top {\bf1}_n$. So journals do have very strict rules on this (e.g. Biometrika) others (say Bayesian Analysis) are not that strict. My advice is to check your journal instructions for this. | |
| Nov 9, 2022 at 12:53 | comment | added | Renato Fernandes | Thanks @utobi. In my case, the columns are independents, but not identically distributed. the notation $\mathbb{X}$ still applies? And more important (for me): It is an recognized and accepted notation in statistical journals? | |
| Nov 9, 2022 at 12:39 | history | answered | utobi | CC BY-SA 4.0 |