Timeline for Uncertainty from Box–Cox estimation
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2017 at 13:58 | comment | added | kjetil b halvorsen♦ | Related: stats.stackexchange.com/questions/122393/… | |
| May 24, 2013 at 22:27 | comment | added | Michael Hardy | +1. Is there anything published on how bootstrap performs on problems like this? (That final "8" in "0.4733268" is of course colossally silly: this is where the noise totally overwhelms the signal.) I wonder if anyone's used Bayesian methods in which the prior on $\lambda$ puts all the weight on rational numbers, and gives more weight to those with small denominators? That way things like $0.5$ are automatically favored over things like $0.4733268$, and in physical data there seem to be reasons for doing things that way. | |
| May 24, 2013 at 21:20 | history | answered | Greg Snow | CC BY-SA 3.0 |