Timeline for How to check for a relationship between water bacterial levels
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2013 at 15:29 | answer | added | Candide | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 29, 2013 at 13:49 | answer | added | DespicableMe | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 28, 2013 at 13:07 | history | edited | PJP | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 146 characters in body
|
| May 28, 2013 at 12:09 | comment | added | Glen_b | That's important information that should be in the question I think. | |
| May 28, 2013 at 12:07 | history | edited | PJP | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
clarification over data set.
|
| S May 28, 2013 at 10:05 | history | suggested | Sven Hohenstein | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added image, removed signature.
|
| May 28, 2013 at 9:55 | comment | added | PJP | Hi @COOLSerdash. It's because we report in standardised TVC/100ml but we filter larger quantities (I think around 400ml-500ml). So 10 bugs in 400ml =2.5/100ml. | |
| May 28, 2013 at 9:53 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S May 28, 2013 at 10:05 | |||||
| May 28, 2013 at 9:52 | comment | added | COOLSerdash | Hi @PJP, welcome to the site! Forgive my ignorance, but if TVC is a count variable, why does it not always come in integers? Count data are usually modelled by a Poisson regression or a Negative binomial regression if your data show overdispersion. | |
| May 28, 2013 at 9:13 | review | First posts | |||
| May 28, 2013 at 9:53 | |||||
| May 28, 2013 at 8:58 | history | asked | PJP | CC BY-SA 3.0 |