Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 2, 2023 at 17:55 comment added jbowman Ah, I see... that's actually kind of clever, if roundabout!
Feb 2, 2023 at 16:56 comment added mhdadk @jbowman the reason I mentioned that it is a Markov chain is to justify the decomposition $$p(x_0,x_1,\dots,x_N) = p(x_N \mid x_{N-1})p(x_{N-1} \mid x_{N-2})\cdots p(x_1 \mid x_0) p(x_0)$$ and then to use this decomposition to prove my statement. I now see from @ThomasLumley’s answer that there a better way to prove this statement without mentioning that the sequence $\{x_k\}$ is a Markov chain.
Feb 2, 2023 at 16:05 comment added jbowman It's deterministic. One could say that $x_{i+t} = x_i + 1$ is a Markov chain, but why? There's no randomness in the transitions; describing multiplication and addition as a Markov chain adds nothing useful to the discussion.
Feb 2, 2023 at 14:56 vote accept mhdadk
Feb 2, 2023 at 14:56 comment added mhdadk @jbowman What I mean by "the sequence $x_0 \to x_1 \to \cdots \to x_N$ forms a Markov chain" is that $x_{k}$ is conditionally independent of $x_{k-2}$ given $x_{k-1}$ for $k = 2,\dots,N-1$. Is there something wrong with saying so?
Feb 2, 2023 at 5:10 history edited User1865345
edited tags
Feb 2, 2023 at 1:04 comment added jbowman As written, $x_k = A^kx_0$, so $\mathbb{E}x_k = A^k\mathbb{E}x_0$
Feb 2, 2023 at 0:59 answer added Thomas Lumley timeline score: 6
Feb 2, 2023 at 0:57 comment added jbowman Why do you think it forms a Markov chain instead of being deterministic? Imagine $A$ is a square matrix of all ones; then at each step, the first element of $x_{i+1}$ is just the sum of the elements of $x_i$, etc. It's a matrix multiplication, not a transition matrix.
Feb 2, 2023 at 0:46 history asked mhdadk CC BY-SA 4.0