Skip to main content
edited body
Source Link
Lmnop
  • 51
  • 5

Let $X, Y, Z$ be r.v's. Suppose $X$ has some influence on $Y$ and $Z$, and $Y$ has some influence on $Z$. Can we quantify the influence $X$ has on $Z$, which is not due to the influence $X \rightarrow Y \rightarrow Z$?

Regress $Y = \beta_1 X + \alpha_1 + \epsilon_1$, then $Y_X = \beta_1 X + \alpha_1$ is the part of $Y$ explained by $X$. Next, regress $Z = \beta_2 X + \alpha_2 + \epsilon_2$$Z = \beta_2 Y + \alpha_2 + \epsilon_2$, expanding to get $Z = \beta_2 Y_X + (\beta_2\epsilon_1 + \alpha_2 + \epsilon_2)$.

Since the former term is the part of $Z$ explained by $X \rightarrow Y \rightarrow Z$, the latter term must be the part of $Z$ which isn't. Therefore we want $\text{Cor}(X, \beta_2\epsilon_1 + \alpha_2 + \epsilon_2) = \text{Cor}(X, \beta_2\epsilon_1+\epsilon_2)$.

What is the name of this type of correlation? (I am pretty sure it isn't just the partial correlation). Also what is the corresponding notion in information theory?

Let $X, Y, Z$ be r.v's. Suppose $X$ has some influence on $Y$ and $Z$, and $Y$ has some influence on $Z$. Can we quantify the influence $X$ has on $Z$, which is not due to the influence $X \rightarrow Y \rightarrow Z$?

Regress $Y = \beta_1 X + \alpha_1 + \epsilon_1$, then $Y_X = \beta_1 X + \alpha_1$ is the part of $Y$ explained by $X$. Next, regress $Z = \beta_2 X + \alpha_2 + \epsilon_2$, expanding to get $Z = \beta_2 Y_X + (\beta_2\epsilon_1 + \alpha_2 + \epsilon_2)$.

Since the former term is the part of $Z$ explained by $X \rightarrow Y \rightarrow Z$, the latter term must be the part of $Z$ which isn't. Therefore we want $\text{Cor}(X, \beta_2\epsilon_1 + \alpha_2 + \epsilon_2) = \text{Cor}(X, \beta_2\epsilon_1+\epsilon_2)$.

What is the name of this type of correlation? (I am pretty sure it isn't just the partial correlation). Also what is the corresponding notion in information theory?

Let $X, Y, Z$ be r.v's. Suppose $X$ has some influence on $Y$ and $Z$, and $Y$ has some influence on $Z$. Can we quantify the influence $X$ has on $Z$, which is not due to the influence $X \rightarrow Y \rightarrow Z$?

Regress $Y = \beta_1 X + \alpha_1 + \epsilon_1$, then $Y_X = \beta_1 X + \alpha_1$ is the part of $Y$ explained by $X$. Next, regress $Z = \beta_2 Y + \alpha_2 + \epsilon_2$, expanding to get $Z = \beta_2 Y_X + (\beta_2\epsilon_1 + \alpha_2 + \epsilon_2)$.

Since the former term is the part of $Z$ explained by $X \rightarrow Y \rightarrow Z$, the latter term must be the part of $Z$ which isn't. Therefore we want $\text{Cor}(X, \beta_2\epsilon_1 + \alpha_2 + \epsilon_2) = \text{Cor}(X, \beta_2\epsilon_1+\epsilon_2)$.

What is the name of this type of correlation? (I am pretty sure it isn't just the partial correlation). Also what is the corresponding notion in information theory?

Source Link
Lmnop
  • 51
  • 5

Correlation / information between $X$ and $Z$ not explained through an intermediate variable $Y$

Let $X, Y, Z$ be r.v's. Suppose $X$ has some influence on $Y$ and $Z$, and $Y$ has some influence on $Z$. Can we quantify the influence $X$ has on $Z$, which is not due to the influence $X \rightarrow Y \rightarrow Z$?

Regress $Y = \beta_1 X + \alpha_1 + \epsilon_1$, then $Y_X = \beta_1 X + \alpha_1$ is the part of $Y$ explained by $X$. Next, regress $Z = \beta_2 X + \alpha_2 + \epsilon_2$, expanding to get $Z = \beta_2 Y_X + (\beta_2\epsilon_1 + \alpha_2 + \epsilon_2)$.

Since the former term is the part of $Z$ explained by $X \rightarrow Y \rightarrow Z$, the latter term must be the part of $Z$ which isn't. Therefore we want $\text{Cor}(X, \beta_2\epsilon_1 + \alpha_2 + \epsilon_2) = \text{Cor}(X, \beta_2\epsilon_1+\epsilon_2)$.

What is the name of this type of correlation? (I am pretty sure it isn't just the partial correlation). Also what is the corresponding notion in information theory?