Timeline for Why do random effects require a minimum # of levels?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2023 at 15:56 | history | edited | Ben Bolker | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
changed ref to PeerJ
|
| Oct 29, 2023 at 0:28 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Oct 28, 2023 at 20:03 | vote | accept | Nate | ||
| Oct 28, 2023 at 19:45 | history | edited | Shawn Hemelstrand | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
reformatted end, added tags, changed some wording to make it more readable
|
| Oct 28, 2023 at 19:40 | answer | added | Shawn Hemelstrand | timeline score: 11 | |
| Oct 28, 2023 at 16:34 | comment | added | dipetkov | Actually better link to the published version in PeerJ, where one can see the reviewers' comments as well: peerj.com/articles/12794. An interesting editorial decision about the title whose final version is "Should I use fixed effects or random effects when I have fewer than five levels of a grouping factor in a mixed-effects model?" | |
| Oct 28, 2023 at 16:31 | comment | added | Henry | Since it is available on BioRxiv,, you might include a link to biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.04.11.439357v2 | |
| Oct 28, 2023 at 16:26 | history | asked | Nate | CC BY-SA 4.0 |