Skip to main content
added 3 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
Source Link
User1865345
  • 10.3k
  • 12
  • 23
  • 40

Question about a Why do normal equation proofequations always have at least one solution?

How can you prove that the normal equations: $(X^TX)\beta = X^TY$$(X^\top X)\beta = X^\top Y$ have one or more solutions without the assumption that X$X $ is invertible?

My only guess is that it has something to do with generalized inverse, but I am totally lost.

Question about a normal equation proof

How can you prove that the normal equations: $(X^TX)\beta = X^TY$ have one or more solutions without the assumption that X is invertible?

My only guess is that it has something to do with generalized inverse, but I am totally lost.

Why do normal equations always have at least one solution?

How can you prove that the normal equations: $(X^\top X)\beta = X^\top Y$ have one or more solutions without the assumption that $X $ is invertible?

My only guess is that it has something to do with generalized inverse, but I am totally lost.

edited body
Source Link
Nick Cox
  • 59.5k
  • 8
  • 136
  • 212

How can you prove that the normal equations: $(X^TX)\beta = X^TY$ have one or more solutions without the assumption that X is invertableinvertible?

My only guess is that it has something to do with generalized inverse, but I am totally lost.

How can you prove that the normal equations: $(X^TX)\beta = X^TY$ have one or more solutions without the assumption that X is invertable?

My only guess is that it has something to do with generalized inverse, but I am totally lost.

How can you prove that the normal equations: $(X^TX)\beta = X^TY$ have one or more solutions without the assumption that X is invertible?

My only guess is that it has something to do with generalized inverse, but I am totally lost.

Source Link
ryati
  • 273
  • 3
  • 8

Question about a normal equation proof

How can you prove that the normal equations: $(X^TX)\beta = X^TY$ have one or more solutions without the assumption that X is invertable?

My only guess is that it has something to do with generalized inverse, but I am totally lost.