Skip to main content
Just missing an "s", although that sentence also contains a double-negative which I left in...
Source Link
Galen
  • 9.7k
  • 3
  • 27
  • 61

Like Shawn, I see no need for a mixed model (aka multilevel model). There's no reaonreason your errors should not be independent in the "regular" regression and that is the problem that MLM or mixed models are designed to solve.

But I would include an interaction between sex and Gatorade. It seems to me that what is interesting here is whether Gatorade has different effects on the runtime of men and women, and that is what an interaction tests.

Like Shawn, I see no need for a mixed model (aka multilevel model). There's no reaon your errors should not be independent in the "regular" regression and that is the problem that MLM or mixed models are designed to solve.

But I would include an interaction between sex and Gatorade. It seems to me that what is interesting here is whether Gatorade has different effects on the runtime of men and women, and that is what an interaction tests.

Like Shawn, I see no need for a mixed model (aka multilevel model). There's no reason your errors should not be independent in the "regular" regression and that is the problem that MLM or mixed models are designed to solve.

But I would include an interaction between sex and Gatorade. It seems to me that what is interesting here is whether Gatorade has different effects on the runtime of men and women, and that is what an interaction tests.

Source Link
Peter Flom
  • 128.2k
  • 36
  • 184
  • 424

Like Shawn, I see no need for a mixed model (aka multilevel model). There's no reaon your errors should not be independent in the "regular" regression and that is the problem that MLM or mixed models are designed to solve.

But I would include an interaction between sex and Gatorade. It seems to me that what is interesting here is whether Gatorade has different effects on the runtime of men and women, and that is what an interaction tests.