Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Jan 27 at 0:04 history bounty ended CommunityBot
S Jan 27 at 0:04 history notice removed CommunityBot
Jan 25 at 11:08 vote accept Lin
Jan 25 at 4:14 comment added usεr11852 Also to stay something else, you probably want some sort of multiple testing correction (see the concept of Bonferroni correction for example).
Jan 24 at 7:20 answer added DrJerryTAO timeline score: 2
Jan 21 at 14:33 comment added whuber That ratio makes no sense. Your percentages, however, correspond to differences in the thousands, each of which is ten or more times any standard error: that is so large that no testing is needed.
Jan 21 at 1:26 comment added Lin Some are bigger the last are smaller. We can compute a ratio $\frac{SE_i}{SE_{tot} - SE_i} \approx [ 0.79, 0.60, 0.70, 0.92, 1.05 ]$.
Jan 20 at 17:58 comment added whuber Good. And how do the differences in the total returns compare to those SEs?
Jan 20 at 0:59 comment added Lin For each $i$-percentage we have the given the approximate $i$-th SE: ${SE}_i = \sqrt{(p * (1-p)) / (1/n)} \approx [94, 80, 88, 102, 109]$. SE total, computed with $SE_{tot} = \sqrt{\sum{SE_i^2}} \approx 214$. Computing the differences $SE_{tot} - SE_i \approx [119, 134, 126,111, 104]$,
Jan 18 at 22:24 comment added whuber You're working too hard. What, approximately, are the standard errors of the total return in each experiment? How do the differences in total returns compare to those standard errors?
S Jan 18 at 22:08 history bounty started Lin
S Jan 18 at 22:08 history notice added Lin Draw attention
Jan 15 at 11:22 history edited Lin CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 4 characters in body
Jan 15 at 11:17 history asked Lin CC BY-SA 4.0