Skip to main content
Cross Validated

Return to Question

added 202 characters in body
Source Link
foggy
foggy
  • 221
  • 1
  • 4

Is there a reason to report classical ANOVA F values (Fisher's F), instead of Welch's F-tests?

I know Welch's F test is corrected, so that it's robust against heterogeneity of variance. This leaves me wondering: Is there any reason why studies don't regularly only report Welch's F?

Is there a reason to report classical ANOVA F values, instead of Welch's F-tests?

Is there a reason to report classical ANOVA F values (Fisher's F), instead of Welch's F-tests?

I know Welch's F test is corrected, so that it's robust against heterogeneity of variance. This leaves me wondering: Is there any reason why studies don't regularly only report Welch's F?

Eliminated the sentence fragment - alternatively, drop the question mark.
Source Link
edit approved Jan 18 at 23:06
Peter Mortensen
edit approved Jan 18 at 23:06
Peter Mortensen
  • 351
  • 3
  • 10

Benefits What are the benefits of classical ANOVA F compared to Welch's F?

Is there anya reason to report classical ANOVA F values, instead of Welch's F-tests?

Benefits of classical ANOVA F compared to Welch's F?

Is there any reason to report classical ANOVA F values, instead of Welch's F-tests?

What are the benefits of classical ANOVA F compared to Welch's F?

Is there a reason to report classical ANOVA F values, instead of Welch's F-tests?

Became Hot Network Question
Source Link
foggy
foggy
  • 221
  • 1
  • 4

Benefits of classical ANOVA F compared to Welch's F?

Is there any reason to report classical ANOVA F values, instead of Welch's F-tests?