Skip to main content
added 301 characters in body
Source Link
wjktrs
  • 870
  • 1
  • 10

The eigenvalues would really only reveal how many classes (single classifier) or how many classifiers are correlated with one another (multiple classifiers). But if you look at the quasi-diagonalized Kappa matrix for all possible pairs of classifiers applied to the 3-class Wine dataset below:

enter image description here

...you can then perform hierarchical cluster analysis using a modified form of Euclidean distance to see which classifiers cluster with one another:

enter image description here

Note, this Kappa matrix is a $13 \times 13$, so when looking at the clustering, I notice three large groups of classifiers which are sizes 6, 5, and 2, so I would expect the eigenvalues, $\lambda_j$, of a $p \times p$ correlation matrix (MCC) to perhaps show something similar to this. That is, you wouldn't likely have one large eigenvalue like 8 or 9, with the remaining in the other dimensions. Instead, based on the clustering, I would guess eigenvalues of e.g. 5,4,1 which gives a sum of 10 for the first 3 components, and then the remaining 10 eigenvalues equal to <1 each so that they sum to 10. Altogether, the 13 eigenvalues would sum to 13, since it can be shown that $p=\sum_j \lambda_j$ when the correlation matrix is used for eigendecomposition.

I believe you can do more surgery (drilling down) regarding discovery on classifier behavior taking this approach instead of performing eigendecomposition.

The eigenvalues would really only reveal how many classes (single classifier) or how many classifiers are correlated with one another (multiple classifiers). But if you look at the quasi-diagonalized Kappa matrix for all possible pairs of classifiers applied to the 3-class Wine dataset below:

enter image description here

...you can then perform hierarchical cluster analysis using a modified form of Euclidean distance to see which classifiers cluster with one another:

enter image description here

Note, this Kappa matrix is a $13 \times 13$, so when looking at the clustering, I notice three large groups of classifiers which are sizes 6, 5, and 2, so I would expect the eigenvalues of a correlation matrix (MCC) to perhaps show something similar to this. That is, you wouldn't likely have one large eigenvalue like 8 or 9, with the remaining in the other dimensions.

I believe you can do more surgery (drilling down) regarding discovery on classifier behavior taking this approach instead of performing eigendecomposition.

The eigenvalues would really only reveal how many classes (single classifier) or how many classifiers are correlated with one another (multiple classifiers). But if you look at the quasi-diagonalized Kappa matrix for all possible pairs of classifiers applied to the 3-class Wine dataset below:

enter image description here

...you can then perform hierarchical cluster analysis using a modified form of Euclidean distance to see which classifiers cluster with one another:

enter image description here

Note, this Kappa matrix is a $13 \times 13$, so when looking at the clustering, I notice three large groups of classifiers which are sizes 6, 5, and 2, so I would expect the eigenvalues, $\lambda_j$, of a $p \times p$ correlation matrix (MCC) to perhaps show something similar to this. That is, you wouldn't likely have one large eigenvalue like 8 or 9, with the remaining in the other dimensions. Instead, based on the clustering, I would guess eigenvalues of e.g. 5,4,1 which gives a sum of 10 for the first 3 components, and then the remaining 10 eigenvalues equal to <1 each so that they sum to 10. Altogether, the 13 eigenvalues would sum to 13, since it can be shown that $p=\sum_j \lambda_j$ when the correlation matrix is used for eigendecomposition.

I believe you can do more surgery (drilling down) regarding discovery on classifier behavior taking this approach instead of performing eigendecomposition.

added 3 characters in body
Source Link
wjktrs
  • 870
  • 1
  • 10

The eigenvalues would really only reveal how many classes (single classifier) or how many classifiers are correlated with one another (multiple classifiers). But if you look at the quasi-diagonalized Kappa matrix for all possible pairs of classifiers applied to the 3-class Wine dataset below:

enter image description here

...you can then perform hierarchical cluster analysis using a modified form of Euclidean distance to see which classifiers cluster with one another:

enter image description here

Note, this Kappa matrix is a $13 \times 13$, so when looking at the clustering, I notice three large groups of classifiers which are sizes 6, 5, and 2, so I would expect the eigenvalues of a correlation matrix (MCC) to perhaps show something similar to this. That is, you wouldn't likely have one large eigenvalue like 8 or 9, with the remaining in the other dimensions.

I believe you can do more surgery (drilling down) regarding discovery on classifier behavior taking this approach instead of performperforming eigendecomposition.

The eigenvalues would really only reveal how many classes (single classifier) or how many classifiers are correlated with one another (multiple classifiers). But if you look at the quasi-diagonalized Kappa matrix for all possible pairs of classifiers applied to the 3-class Wine dataset below:

enter image description here

...you can then perform hierarchical cluster analysis using a modified form of Euclidean distance to see which classifiers cluster with one another:

enter image description here

Note, this Kappa matrix is a $13 \times 13$, so when looking at the clustering, I notice three large groups of classifiers which are sizes 6, 5, and 2, so I would expect the eigenvalues of a correlation matrix (MCC) to perhaps show something similar to this. That is, you wouldn't likely have one large eigenvalue like 8 or 9, with the remaining in the other dimensions.

I believe you can do more surgery (drilling down) regarding discovery on classifier behavior taking this approach instead of perform eigendecomposition.

The eigenvalues would really only reveal how many classes (single classifier) or how many classifiers are correlated with one another (multiple classifiers). But if you look at the quasi-diagonalized Kappa matrix for all possible pairs of classifiers applied to the 3-class Wine dataset below:

enter image description here

...you can then perform hierarchical cluster analysis using a modified form of Euclidean distance to see which classifiers cluster with one another:

enter image description here

Note, this Kappa matrix is a $13 \times 13$, so when looking at the clustering, I notice three large groups of classifiers which are sizes 6, 5, and 2, so I would expect the eigenvalues of a correlation matrix (MCC) to perhaps show something similar to this. That is, you wouldn't likely have one large eigenvalue like 8 or 9, with the remaining in the other dimensions.

I believe you can do more surgery (drilling down) regarding discovery on classifier behavior taking this approach instead of performing eigendecomposition.

added 3 characters in body
Source Link
wjktrs
  • 870
  • 1
  • 10

The eigenvalues would really only reveal how many classes (single classifier) or how many classifiers are correlated with one another (multiple classifiers). But if you look at the quasi-diagonalized Kappa matrix for all possible pairs of classifiers applied to the 3-class Wine dataset below:

enter image description here

You...you can then quasi-diagonalize the Kappa matrix and perform hierarchical cluster analysis using a modified form of Euclidean distance to see which classifiers cluster with one another:

enter image description here

Note, this Kappa matrix is a $13 \times 13$, so when looking at the clustering, I notice three large groups of classifiers which are sizes 6, 5, and 2, so I would expect the eigenvalues of a correlation matrix (MCC) to perhaps show something similar to this. That is, you wouldn't likely have one large eigenvalue like 8 or 9, with the remaining in the other dimensions.

I believe you can do more surgery (drilling down) regarding discovery on classifier behavior taking this approach instead of perform eigendecomposition.

The eigenvalues would really only reveal how many classes (single classifier) or how many classifiers are correlated with one another (multiple classifiers). But if you look at the Kappa matrix for all possible pairs of classifiers applied to the 3-class Wine dataset below:

enter image description here

You can then quasi-diagonalize the Kappa matrix and perform hierarchical cluster analysis using a modified form of Euclidean distance to see which classifiers cluster with one another:

enter image description here

Note, this Kappa matrix is a $13 \times 13$, so when looking at the clustering, I notice three large groups of classifiers which are sizes 6, 5, and 2, so I would expect the eigenvalues of a correlation matrix (MCC) to perhaps show something similar to this. That is, you wouldn't likely have one large eigenvalue like 8 or 9, with the remaining in the other dimensions.

I believe you can do more surgery (drilling down) regarding discovery on classifier behavior taking this approach instead of perform eigendecomposition.

The eigenvalues would really only reveal how many classes (single classifier) or how many classifiers are correlated with one another (multiple classifiers). But if you look at the quasi-diagonalized Kappa matrix for all possible pairs of classifiers applied to the 3-class Wine dataset below:

enter image description here

...you can then perform hierarchical cluster analysis using a modified form of Euclidean distance to see which classifiers cluster with one another:

enter image description here

Note, this Kappa matrix is a $13 \times 13$, so when looking at the clustering, I notice three large groups of classifiers which are sizes 6, 5, and 2, so I would expect the eigenvalues of a correlation matrix (MCC) to perhaps show something similar to this. That is, you wouldn't likely have one large eigenvalue like 8 or 9, with the remaining in the other dimensions.

I believe you can do more surgery (drilling down) regarding discovery on classifier behavior taking this approach instead of perform eigendecomposition.

Source Link
wjktrs
  • 870
  • 1
  • 10
Loading