Timeline for Can log2 be substituted with ln in logDice association measure?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31 at 13:59 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Mar 31 at 11:07 | comment | added | pindakazen | I agree with you, and to answer your second sentence, the extra 14 is employed because typically Dice coefficient values, especially when transformed using logarithm, will yield extremely small number. So the extra 14 acts as a theoretical maximum of the logDice measurement. And in addition, it will make any negative values of the collocation to signify insignificant result (Rychlý, 2008) | |
| Mar 31 at 10:47 | comment | added | Nick Cox | This would benefit from an explicit reference for Rychlý, 2008. What is the point of the extra 14: just to avoid negative values? | |
| Mar 31 at 10:08 | vote | accept | pindakazen | ||
| Mar 31 at 10:03 | answer | added | Shawn Hemelstrand | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 31 at 9:37 | history | edited | Shawn Hemelstrand | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed formatting, added clarification, added tags
|
| S Mar 31 at 5:56 | review | First questions | |||
| Mar 31 at 9:31 | |||||
| S Mar 31 at 5:56 | history | asked | pindakazen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |