Timeline for Can using Fisherian inference help me to be more confident of an underpowered result?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12 at 4:42 | vote | accept | Santiago Valdivieso | ||
| S May 30 at 12:36 | history | bounty ended | Santiago Valdivieso | ||
| S May 30 at 12:36 | history | notice removed | Santiago Valdivieso | ||
| May 25 at 12:30 | comment | added | J-J-J | @SantiagoValdivieso I can't speak for Michael Lew, but I think his comment implied the question of the costs and benefits of a trial designed for detecting such an effect size. | |
| May 25 at 6:19 | answer | added | num_39 | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 25 at 4:13 | comment | added | Santiago Valdivieso | @MichaelLew Behind the phrase "the literature suggests", are metanalysis that suggest impacts no greater than 0.1 SD. This is an empirical answer to your question "is it a realistically ...". | |
| May 24 at 22:02 | comment | added | Michael Lew | I don't know anything about discontinuous regression, but I do know that ideas like "the literature suggests that I should look for a minimum detectable effect size of about 0.1 standard deviations" are unhelpful. Is an effect of 0.1xSD large enough to matter to the trial participants? Is it a realistically achievable effect size to design a trial around? | |
| May 24 at 15:22 | comment | added | Santiago Valdivieso | Yes, you are totally right! For some reason both concepts where mixed up in my mind. I edited the question, thank you! | |
| May 24 at 15:21 | history | edited | Santiago Valdivieso | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 68 characters in body; edited title
|
| May 24 at 14:27 | comment | added | Demetri Pananos | I see "For example, in the context of local randomization methods, Fisherian inference methods continue to be valid...". Is this what you're referring to? I don't think this references FIsher's exact test. Rather, I think it refers to randomization inference, of which I believe Fisher was also involved. | |
| May 24 at 8:42 | comment | added | Santiago Valdivieso | Page 15 recommends its use when sample size is small. In page 46 talks about its potential use when the instrument is weak. | |
| May 24 at 0:13 | comment | added | Demetri Pananos | Where in your link is it mentioned that one can Fisher's Exact test? | |
| S May 23 at 23:54 | history | bounty started | Santiago Valdivieso | ||
| S May 23 at 23:54 | history | notice added | Santiago Valdivieso | Authoritative reference needed | |
| May 18 at 0:54 | history | edited | User1865345 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| May 17 at 22:18 | history | asked | Santiago Valdivieso | CC BY-SA 4.0 |