Timeline for Emtrends pairwise comparisons all have same standard errors. 3 way interaction
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12 at 12:39 | answer | added | Sointu | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 12 at 11:47 | comment | added | Peter Flom | That is a lot clearer; unfortunately, I don't know the answer. | |
| Jun 12 at 4:35 | comment | added | Jackson | Hi Peter, I clarified the question a bit, and added my code and output. I hope it's more clear to understand. As seen in the output, bread freshness over time for types 2, and 5 are positively impacted by the baker being an expert. This I feel is correct as it can be seen in boxplots. However, all of the standard errors are the same regardless of the magnitude of each contrast estimate, so some have extremely wide confidence intervals in relation to their estimate, if that makes sense? Or is the SE based on the original mixed model, and a product of partial pooling? Thanks again for your help! | |
| Jun 12 at 4:16 | history | edited | Jackson | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 487 characters in body
|
| Jun 11 at 17:22 | comment | added | Peter Flom | In your question, you have time, group1, and group2. In your output, you have skill and type. It looks like type is group2. But if you stratify by a variable that is in an interaction, things will get weird. Can you show your code? Or explain what you did in more detail? | |
| Jun 11 at 16:41 | history | asked | Jackson | CC BY-SA 4.0 |