Timeline for Two way anova or paired t-tests
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9 at 11:43 | history | edited | Frans Rodenburg |
edited tags
|
|
| Aug 9 at 11:42 | answer | added | Frans Rodenburg | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 9 at 7:36 | comment | added | Adrian | No, I perhaps should have been more specific but the only element I am putting forward as paired are the surface and bottom samples, as they are recorded at the same time in the same location, for each replicate. | |
| Aug 9 at 7:20 | comment | added | jginestet | There is nothing paired in your data. To be paired, it needs to be the exact same "unit" being measured twice, under differnet conditions; you surface/bottom measurements are not paired (different sample of water), your replicates are not paired either (each is an independent water sample), your 2 periods are not paired either. And the sites are not paired either (same creek, but a different water sample again). So paired t-tests would not make sense. | |
| Aug 9 at 7:06 | comment | added | Adrian | They are taken in the same pool area for both periods | |
| Aug 9 at 6:52 | history | edited | Adrian | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| S Aug 9 at 6:45 | review | First questions | |||
| Aug 9 at 7:22 | |||||
| S Aug 9 at 6:45 | history | asked | Adrian | CC BY-SA 4.0 |