Timeline for R implementation of coefficient of partial determination
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2021 at 20:43 | answer | added | David F | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 31, 2021 at 19:00 | answer | added | Onyambu | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 17, 2011 at 22:33 | vote | accept | Chase | ||
| May 19, 2011 at 0:26 | comment | added | Chase | @caracal - whatever you see fit. I know there's been a fair amount of discussion regarding where the line in the sand should be drawn between SO and CV regarding R related questions. I don't have a strong preference either way. My work has taken me away from this specific problem for the last bit, but will be revisiting it again in the coming weeks so I may come up with a better solution myself. I'm also fine letting the question fade off into the ether... | |
| May 18, 2011 at 21:45 | comment | added | caracal | I suggest this question be migrated to SE. At the heart of the question seems to be an implementation problem, not a statistical one. | |
| Apr 18, 2011 at 20:45 | answer | added | Patrick McCann | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 7, 2011 at 16:07 | comment | added | Chase | @robin - I apologize if my question wasn't clear. I am interested in finding a package that contains this calculation (as it probably contains many other helpful functions that would be useful) and/or suggestions on how to improve the function I wrote above. It is obviously lacking any error checking, and may not be applicable for all model types. | |
| Mar 7, 2011 at 12:39 | comment | added | robin girard | I don't really see the question. You want a function that calculates partial R2, but you already have one. Do you know package sensitivity (there are no partial R2 but pcc which is a particular case is implemented)? | |
| Mar 2, 2011 at 15:05 | comment | added | mpiktas | I suggest trying the other models and see whether the code works or not. R is usually nice, so anova should return similar things for different models. The problem is with your initial formula. Does it hold for other models? If it does not, then there is no point in getting code to work, furthermore the code should issue a warning that it is used for models where formula does not hold. | |
| Mar 2, 2011 at 5:23 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackStats/status/42817194152820736 | ||
| Mar 2, 2011 at 4:13 | history | asked | Chase | CC BY-SA 2.5 |