Timeline for Prevalence conversion to effect size in meta-analysis
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2014 at 23:38 | vote | accept | user30295 | ||
| Feb 5, 2014 at 6:15 | comment | added | Bernd Weiss | @user30295 No, I am sorry. In that case you probably have to deal with multiple dependent variables and run one meta-analysis per dependent variable. | |
| Feb 2, 2014 at 22:37 | comment | added | user30295 | Thank you @Bernd Weiss ! Follow up question: These formulas are for dichotomized or categorical data. The literature I have measures stigma on various continuous scales. I could: 1) say that anyone who scores 1 st. deviation above the mean qualified as stigmatizing; or 2) create cut points for each scale (though they would be arbitary). Neither seem like great options. If you are aware of other ways to use continuous scales to determine prevalence/severity, I would appreciate the advice. | |
| Feb 2, 2014 at 22:24 | comment | added | user30295 | Thank you! Now I'm struggling with how to work with the different scales in this format. Studies use different scales which aremeasuring the same construct. I could: | |
| Jan 11, 2014 at 7:55 | history | answered | Bernd Weiss | CC BY-SA 3.0 |