Timeline for On cophenetic correlation for dendrogram clustering
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2020 at 14:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Jan 25, 2014 at 23:49 | comment | added | gung - Reinstate Monica | I wish I were more expert on this. I don't quite follow your example w/ the heatmaps. What is it that you see that makes it obvious the CC(A) > the CC(B)? Eg, if the upper triangles were cophenetic distances & the lower triangles were original distances, & both displayed similar patterns, then I would recognize that the CC would be high, etc. W/ these I'm not sure how to make such an inference. Is it just that A will naturally give rise to better clustering & so the resulting CC will just have to end up matching well? | |
| Jan 25, 2014 at 11:09 | history | answered | user35349 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |