Skip to main content
added 109 characters in body
Source Link
Glen_b
  • 290.5k
  • 37
  • 652
  • 1.1k

The usual approach involves interchanging the position of the column you want removed and the last one, and returning the Cholesky to triangular form via either Givens rotations or Householder transforms, whereupon you can simply drop the last one.

Similarly you can update an additional column into any position by adding to the end and then swapping into the desired position followed by the Givens/Householder transformations to fix it back up to triangular form.

When you do the swap of columns, you destroy the triangular form you need it to have. Each of the Givens rotations (or Householder transforms) then fixes up one of the values that are 'sticking out', until they are all fixed. This is quite a lot faster than recomputing from scratch.

I'll talk about rotations (but the Householder transforms do the same job, so much of the discussion carries over directly). For each non-zero value that's 'sticking out', you apply a Givens rotation (a 2x2 matrix of $\sin\theta$ and $\cos\theta$ values representing a rotation through $\theta$), so that it 'zeroes' that one value. It changes other values, but retains the $A=RR'$ property. By starting with the value that's sticking out the most and working in toward the diagonal of the triangle, you end up not losing the values you choose to zero out - that is, if you do things in the right order, the zeros you make at one step are still zeros the next step.

The Householder approach is a bit more efficient.


References. Hmm.

Matrix Computations (Golub and Van Loan) has a section on updating calculations - 12.5.2 "Adding or deleting a column" - it mostly talks about QR but much of the approaches and ideas carry over.

The documentation of the LINPACK routine SCHEX (*) and some of the other routines was actually where I first saw (and eventually understood, many, many years ago now) how to do it (if you have access to a library an old users guide may be available). I found its explanation relatively straightforward at the time.

* that function simply permutes the order of the variables in a Cholesky; this uses (I think) Givens rotations, which is relatively easy to find information on.

In fact, the documentation right in the code you can see online** is fairly informative. I am not sure the documentation said very much more than that. The description is clearly using Givens rotations.

** I mean the block of comments at the top

I'm sure I have something else on it somewhere; I'll have to see what other references I have.

The usual approach involves interchanging the position of the column you want removed and the last one, and returning the Cholesky to triangular form via either Givens rotations or Householder transforms, whereupon you can simply drop the last one.

Similarly you can update an additional column into any position by adding to the end and then swapping into the desired position followed by the Givens/Householder transformations to fix it back up to triangular form.

When you do the swap of columns, you destroy the triangular form you need it to have. Each of the Givens rotations (or Householder transforms) then fixes up one of the values that are 'sticking out', until they are all fixed. This is quite a lot faster than recomputing from scratch.

I'll talk about rotations (but the Householder transforms do the same job, so much of the discussion carries over directly). For each non-zero value that's 'sticking out', you apply a Givens rotation (a 2x2 matrix of $\sin\theta$ and $\cos\theta$ values representing a rotation through $\theta$), so that it 'zeroes' that one value. It changes other values, but retains the $A=RR'$ property. By starting with the value that's sticking out the most and working in toward the diagonal of the triangle, you end up not losing the values you choose to zero out.

The Householder approach is a bit more efficient.


References. Hmm.

Matrix Computations (Golub and Van Loan) has a section on updating calculations - 12.5.2 "Adding or deleting a column" - it mostly talks about QR but much of the approaches and ideas carry over.

The documentation of the LINPACK routine SCHEX (*) and some of the other routines was actually where I first saw (and eventually understood, many, many years ago now) how to do it (if you have access to a library an old users guide may be available). I found its explanation relatively straightforward at the time.

* that function simply permutes the order of the variables in a Cholesky; this uses (I think) Givens rotations, which is relatively easy to find information on.

In fact, the documentation right in the code you can see online** is fairly informative. I am not sure the documentation said very much more than that. The description is clearly using Givens rotations.

** I mean the block of comments at the top

I'm sure I have something else on it somewhere; I'll have to see what other references I have.

The usual approach involves interchanging the position of the column you want removed and the last one, and returning the Cholesky to triangular form via either Givens rotations or Householder transforms, whereupon you can simply drop the last one.

Similarly you can update an additional column into any position by adding to the end and then swapping into the desired position followed by the Givens/Householder transformations to fix it back up to triangular form.

When you do the swap of columns, you destroy the triangular form you need it to have. Each of the Givens rotations (or Householder transforms) then fixes up one of the values that are 'sticking out', until they are all fixed. This is quite a lot faster than recomputing from scratch.

I'll talk about rotations (but the Householder transforms do the same job, so much of the discussion carries over directly). For each non-zero value that's 'sticking out', you apply a Givens rotation (a 2x2 matrix of $\sin\theta$ and $\cos\theta$ values representing a rotation through $\theta$), so that it 'zeroes' that one value. It changes other values, but retains the $A=RR'$ property. By starting with the value that's sticking out the most and working in toward the diagonal of the triangle, you end up not losing the values you choose to zero out - that is, if you do things in the right order, the zeros you make at one step are still zeros the next step.

The Householder approach is a bit more efficient.


References. Hmm.

Matrix Computations (Golub and Van Loan) has a section on updating calculations - 12.5.2 "Adding or deleting a column" - it mostly talks about QR but much of the approaches and ideas carry over.

The documentation of the LINPACK routine SCHEX (*) and some of the other routines was actually where I first saw (and eventually understood, many, many years ago now) how to do it (if you have access to a library an old users guide may be available). I found its explanation relatively straightforward at the time.

* that function simply permutes the order of the variables in a Cholesky; this uses (I think) Givens rotations, which is relatively easy to find information on.

In fact, the documentation right in the code you can see online** is fairly informative. I am not sure the documentation said very much more than that. The description is clearly using Givens rotations.

** I mean the block of comments at the top

I'm sure I have something else on it somewhere; I'll have to see what other references I have.

added 560 characters in body
Source Link
Glen_b
  • 290.5k
  • 37
  • 652
  • 1.1k

The usual approach involves interchanging the position of the column you want removed and the last one, and returning the Cholesky to triangular form via either Givens rotations or Householder transforms, whereupon you can simply drop the last one.

(Similarly Similarly you can update an additional column into any position by adding to the end and then swapping into the desired position followed by the Givens/Householder transformations to fix it back up to triangular form.)

When you do the swap of columns, you destroy the triangular form you need it to have. Each of the Givens rotations (or Householder transforms) then fixes up one of the values that are 'sticking out', until they are all fixed. This is quite a lot faster than recomputing from scratch.

I'll talk about rotations (but the Householder transforms do the same job, so much of the discussion carries over directly). For each non-zero value that's 'sticking out', you apply a Givens rotation (a 2x2 matrix of $\sin\theta$ and $\cos\theta$ values representing a rotation through $\theta$), so that it 'zeroes' that one value. It changes other values, but retains the $A=RR'$ property. By starting with the value that's sticking out the most and working in toward the diagonal of the triangle, you end up not losing the values you choose to zero out.

The Householder approach is a bit more efficient.


References. Hmm.

Matrix Computations (Golub and Van Loan) has a section on updating calculations - 12.5.2 "Adding or deleting a column" - it mostly talks about QR but much of the approaches and ideas carry over.

The documentation of the LINPACK routine SCHEX (*) and some of the other routines was actually where I first saw (and eventually understood, many, many years ago now) how to do it (if you have access to a library an old users guide may be available). I found its explanation relatively straightforward at the time.

* that function simply permutes the order of the variables in a Cholesky; this uses (I think) Givens rotations, which is relatively easy to find information on.

In fact, the documentation right in the code you can see online** is fairly informative. I am not sure the documentation said very much more than that. The description is clearly using Givens rotations.

** I mean the block of comments at the top

I'm sure I have something else on it somewhere; I'll have to see what other references I have.

The usual approach involves interchanging the position of the column you want removed and the last one, and returning the Cholesky to triangular form via either Givens rotations or Householder transforms, whereupon you can simply drop the last one.

(Similarly you can update an additional column into any position by adding to the end and then swapping into the desired position followed by the Givens/Householder transformations to fix it back up to triangular form.)

When you do the swap of columns, you destroy the triangular form you need it to have. Each of the Givens rotations (or Householder transforms) then fixes up one of the values that are 'sticking out', until they are all fixed. This is quite a lot faster than recomputing from scratch.

The Householder approach is a bit more efficient.


References. Hmm.

Matrix Computations (Golub and Van Loan) has a section on updating calculations - 12.5.2 "Adding or deleting a column" - it mostly talks about QR but much of the approaches and ideas carry over.

The documentation of the LINPACK routine SCHEX (*) and some of the other routines was actually where I first saw (and eventually understood, many, many years ago now) how to do it (if you have access to a library an old users guide may be available). I found its explanation relatively straightforward at the time.

* that function simply permutes the order of the variables in a Cholesky; this uses (I think) Givens rotations, which is relatively easy to find information on.

In fact, the documentation right in the code you can see online** is fairly informative. I am not sure the documentation said very much more than that. The description is clearly using Givens rotations.

** I mean the block of comments at the top

I'm sure I have something else on it somewhere; I'll have to see what other references I have.

The usual approach involves interchanging the position of the column you want removed and the last one, and returning the Cholesky to triangular form via either Givens rotations or Householder transforms, whereupon you can simply drop the last one.

Similarly you can update an additional column into any position by adding to the end and then swapping into the desired position followed by the Givens/Householder transformations to fix it back up to triangular form.

When you do the swap of columns, you destroy the triangular form you need it to have. Each of the Givens rotations (or Householder transforms) then fixes up one of the values that are 'sticking out', until they are all fixed. This is quite a lot faster than recomputing from scratch.

I'll talk about rotations (but the Householder transforms do the same job, so much of the discussion carries over directly). For each non-zero value that's 'sticking out', you apply a Givens rotation (a 2x2 matrix of $\sin\theta$ and $\cos\theta$ values representing a rotation through $\theta$), so that it 'zeroes' that one value. It changes other values, but retains the $A=RR'$ property. By starting with the value that's sticking out the most and working in toward the diagonal of the triangle, you end up not losing the values you choose to zero out.

The Householder approach is a bit more efficient.


References. Hmm.

Matrix Computations (Golub and Van Loan) has a section on updating calculations - 12.5.2 "Adding or deleting a column" - it mostly talks about QR but much of the approaches and ideas carry over.

The documentation of the LINPACK routine SCHEX (*) and some of the other routines was actually where I first saw (and eventually understood, many, many years ago now) how to do it (if you have access to a library an old users guide may be available). I found its explanation relatively straightforward at the time.

* that function simply permutes the order of the variables in a Cholesky; this uses (I think) Givens rotations, which is relatively easy to find information on.

In fact, the documentation right in the code you can see online** is fairly informative. I am not sure the documentation said very much more than that. The description is clearly using Givens rotations.

** I mean the block of comments at the top

I'm sure I have something else on it somewhere; I'll have to see what other references I have.

added 52 characters in body
Source Link
Glen_b
  • 290.5k
  • 37
  • 652
  • 1.1k

The usual approach involves interchanging the position of the column you want removed and the last one, and returning the Cholesky to triangular form via either Givens rotations or Householder transforms, whereupon you can simply drop the last one.

(Similarly you can update an additional column into any position by adding to the end and then swapping into the desired position followed by the Givens/Householder transformations to fix it back up to triangular form.)

When you do the swap of columns, you destroy the triangular form you need it to have. Each of the Givens rotations (or Householder transforms) then fixes up one of the values that are 'sticking out', until they are all fixed. This is quite a lot faster than recomputing from scratch.

The Householder approach is a bit more efficient.


References. Hmm.

Matrix Computations (Golub and Van Loan) has a section on updating calculations - 12.5.2 "Adding or deleting a column" - it mostly talks about QR but much of the approaches and ideas carry over.

The documentation of the LINPACK routine SCHEX (*) and some of the other routines was actually where I first saw (and eventually understood, many, many years ago now) how to do it (if you have access to a library an old users guide may be available). I found its explanation relatively straightforward at the time.

* that function simply permutes the order of the variables in a Cholesky; this uses (I think) Givens rotations, which is relatively easy to find information on.

In fact, the documentation right in the code you can see online** is fairly informative. I am not sure the documentation said very much more than that. The description is clearly using Givens rotations.

** I mean the block of comments at the top

I'm sure I have something else on it somewhere; I'll have to see what other references I have.

The usual approach involves interchanging the position of the column you want removed and the last one, and returning the Cholesky to triangular form via either Givens rotations or Householder transforms, whereupon you can simply drop the last one.

(Similarly you can update an additional column into any position by adding to the end and then swapping into the desired position followed by the Givens/Householder transformations to fix it back up to triangular form.)

When you do the swap of columns, you destroy the triangular form you need it to have. Each of the Givens rotations (or Householder transforms) then fixes up one of the values that are 'sticking out', until they are all fixed. This is quite a lot faster than recomputing from scratch.

The Householder approach is a bit more efficient.


References. Hmm.

Matrix Computations (Golub and Van Loan) has a section on updating calculations - 12.5.2 "Adding or deleting a column" - it mostly talks about QR but much of the approaches and ideas carry over.

The documentation of the LINPACK routine SCHEX (*) and some of the other routines was actually where I first saw (and eventually understood, many, many years ago now) how to do it (if you have access to a library an old users guide may be available). I found its explanation relatively straightforward at the time.

* that function simply permutes the order of the variables in a Cholesky; this uses (I think) Givens rotations, which is relatively easy to find information on.

In fact, the documentation right in the code you can see online is fairly informative. I am not sure the documentation said very much more than that. The description is clearly using Givens rotations.

I'm sure I have something else on it somewhere; I'll have to see what other references I have.

The usual approach involves interchanging the position of the column you want removed and the last one, and returning the Cholesky to triangular form via either Givens rotations or Householder transforms, whereupon you can simply drop the last one.

(Similarly you can update an additional column into any position by adding to the end and then swapping into the desired position followed by the Givens/Householder transformations to fix it back up to triangular form.)

When you do the swap of columns, you destroy the triangular form you need it to have. Each of the Givens rotations (or Householder transforms) then fixes up one of the values that are 'sticking out', until they are all fixed. This is quite a lot faster than recomputing from scratch.

The Householder approach is a bit more efficient.


References. Hmm.

Matrix Computations (Golub and Van Loan) has a section on updating calculations - 12.5.2 "Adding or deleting a column" - it mostly talks about QR but much of the approaches and ideas carry over.

The documentation of the LINPACK routine SCHEX (*) and some of the other routines was actually where I first saw (and eventually understood, many, many years ago now) how to do it (if you have access to a library an old users guide may be available). I found its explanation relatively straightforward at the time.

* that function simply permutes the order of the variables in a Cholesky; this uses (I think) Givens rotations, which is relatively easy to find information on.

In fact, the documentation right in the code you can see online** is fairly informative. I am not sure the documentation said very much more than that. The description is clearly using Givens rotations.

** I mean the block of comments at the top

I'm sure I have something else on it somewhere; I'll have to see what other references I have.

added 784 characters in body
Source Link
Glen_b
  • 290.5k
  • 37
  • 652
  • 1.1k
Loading
added 53 characters in body
Source Link
Glen_b
  • 290.5k
  • 37
  • 652
  • 1.1k
Loading
Source Link
Glen_b
  • 290.5k
  • 37
  • 652
  • 1.1k
Loading