Timeline for Warning messages from mixed model (glmer)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2015 at 18:30 | comment | added | Henrik | @ABC If you need a lot of samples you either have massive amounts of data or an overparameterized model. But as long as the warning appears you have to increase the number. As long as the warning is there the results are non-sensical. | |
| Jul 22, 2015 at 3:45 | comment | added | ABC |
Is there any rules what value will I use for maxfun , i.e., maxfun=100000 or maxfun=1500000 ? Is there any advantage/disadvantage of increasing the number ?
|
|
| S Jul 2, 2015 at 19:21 | history | suggested | rjweyant | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added parenthesis and corrected option name -- optCtrl, not optctrl
|
| Jul 2, 2015 at 18:54 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 2, 2015 at 19:21 | |||||
| May 15, 2014 at 14:28 | comment | added | Henrik | You should then post the new warnings. But you might also want to check this. | |
| May 15, 2014 at 13:37 | comment | added | David Z | Thanks, Henrik! It does work now for the the first warning. But the other two are still three. I don't know whether there's way for model convergence issue. | |
| May 15, 2014 at 13:17 | history | answered | Henrik | CC BY-SA 3.0 |