-1
$\begingroup$

The question asks to find $ \chi^{2*} $ that cuts off 5% of the tail with df=52. the chart given lists df=50 then jumps to 60

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ You may want to remove the * from your body text as well. Your question is covered in the answer here: How do I find values not given in (interpolate in) statistical tables? $\endgroup$
    – Glen_b
    Commented Nov 25, 2015 at 21:53
  • $\begingroup$ in the title it was an error, in the question it just means a specific value of $\chi^2$ opposed to the whole range $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 25, 2015 at 21:56
  • $\begingroup$ It's probably more confusing than enlightening. I'd suggest "find the $\chi^2$ value that..." $\endgroup$
    – Glen_b
    Commented Nov 25, 2015 at 21:58
  • $\begingroup$ When you say "the question asks" .... is this for a class? $\endgroup$
    – Glen_b
    Commented Nov 25, 2015 at 21:59
  • $\begingroup$ Specifically, note that for degrees of freedom for $t$, $\chi^2$ and $F$ the linked answer recommends linear interpolation in $1/\text{df}$ rather than in $\text{df}$. However in this particular case, linear interpolation in $\text{df}$ is actually very good, slightly better than inverse interpolation in df; I'd stick with that for this case (which is what the first half of the linked post is about). $\endgroup$
    – Glen_b
    Commented Nov 25, 2015 at 22:09

1 Answer 1

-2
$\begingroup$

I would take the data from df=50 in this case. If it was 55--> average

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ (-1) This is not interpolation at all. If you're going to average for $df=55$, which is (linear) interpolation, then why not linearly interpolate for $df=52$? Why introduce such an inconsistency, especially when the error made when replacing $52$ by $50$ is substantial? $\endgroup$
    – whuber
    Commented Nov 25, 2015 at 22:03

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.