I have come across a number of papers that write "naive Bays" instead of "naive Bayes". Are these different algorithms or just a popular typo?
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
3
-
5$\begingroup$ If you see someone omit the "e" from Bayes' name you really have to wonder how familiar they are with Bayesian statistics (or how carefully they read their own work - and either option is a worrying sign). Anyone who has read more than a couple of books on statistics will have seen it spelled correctly many dozens of times, and if there was any doubt, one can easily search for it - the correct spelling does show up. $\endgroup$– Glen_bCommented Sep 7, 2016 at 2:59
-
$\begingroup$ Your link takes me to a Google search for "naive Bays" but with results for "naive Bayes"....was this intended? $\endgroup$– JonCommented Nov 7, 2017 at 16:54
-
$\begingroup$ @Glen_b you might say that it is a sign that bae is naive $\endgroup$– generic_userCommented Nov 7, 2017 at 17:35
Add a comment
|
1 Answer
2
-
1$\begingroup$ I don't get it. It just takes you to a wikipedia page. What are you trying to show? $\endgroup$– JonCommented Nov 7, 2017 at 16:54
-
1$\begingroup$ He's telling you to trust the way Wikipedia has it $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 6, 2019 at 13:53